Literature DB >> 10624999

Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia.

B Larsen1, A Seitz, R Larsen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the recovery characteristics of remifentanil, desflurane, and sevoflurane when used for anesthesia in elective operative procedures. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18-65 yr, were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-propofol, desflurane-N2O, or sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the desflurane and sevoflurane groups received fentanyl 2 microg/kg. In all groups, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained either with remifentanil 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), desflurane, or sevoflurane 0.85 MAC with 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate level of surgical anesthesia and to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Early recovery times and a modified Aldrete Recovery Score > 9 were recorded. Trieger Dot Test and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) were performed the day before surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit to evaluate intermediate recovery. The remifentanil-propofol group had a significantly faster emergence than desflurane or sevoflurane, with no difference between both inhaled anesthetics. Thirty min after anesthesia administration, patients in the remifentanil-propofol and in the desflurane groups gave significantly more correct responses in the DSST compared with sevoflurane (remifentanil 87%, desflurane 83%, sevoflurane 56%), the impairment in the sevoflurane patients corresponding to the effects of a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.1% and, thus, being of clinical importance. Ninety minutes after anesthesia administration, no significant difference could be demonstrated among the groups in the DSST scores. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration. IMPLICATIONS: We compared awakening and intermediate recovery times after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia to desflurane-N2O and sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10624999     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200001000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

1.  Effects of anesthesia type on short-term postoperative cognitive function in obstetric patients following cesarean section.

Authors:  Celalettin Altun; Hale Borazan; Osman Şahin; Kazım Gezginç
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  Comparison of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery using a combination of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block and local infiltration anesthesia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Masami Sato; Gotaro Shirakami; Kazuhiko Fukuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Effect of palonosetron on postanesthetic shivering after propofol-remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Youn Yi Jo; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Mi Geum Lee; Oh Kyung Lim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Akihiro Kanaya; Norifumi Kuratani; Daizoh Satoh; Shin Kurosawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Recovery Profile and Patient Satisfaction After Ambulatory Anesthesia for Dental Treatment-A Crossover Comparison Between Propofol and Sevoflurane.

Authors:  Keita Ohkushi; Ken-Ichi Fukuda; Yoshihiko Koukita; Yuzuru Kaneko; Tatsuya Ichinohe
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

6.  Early post-anaesthesia recovery parameters - a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Zeyad Alkandari; Stephanie L Kind; Donat R Spahn; Peter Biro
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-10

7.  Duration of EEG suppression does not predict recovery time or degree of cognitive impairment after general anaesthesia in human volunteers.

Authors:  B P Shortal; L B Hickman; R A Mak-McCully; W Wang; C Brennan; H Ung; B Litt; V Tarnal; E Janke; P Picton; S Blain-Moraes; H R Maybrier; M R Muench; N Lin; M S Avidan; G A Mashour; A R McKinstry-Wu; M B Kelz; B J Palanca; A Proekt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Patient experience of sexual hallucinations after propofol-induced painless abortion may lead to violence against medical personnel.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Bin Yi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  A pharmacodynamic analysis of factors affecting recovery from anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil target controlled infusion.

Authors:  Bon-Nyeo Koo; Jeong-Rim Lee; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Jae-Hoon Lee; Young-Ran Kang; Dong-Woo Han
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Comparison of cognitive, ambulatory, and psychomotor recovery profiles after day care anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane.

Authors:  Satyen Parida; Ashok Shankar Badhe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.