Literature DB >> 10624992

Three-in-one blocks with ropivacaine: evaluation of sensory onset time and quality of sensory block.

P Marhofer1, C Oismüller, B Faryniak, C Sitzwohl, N Mayer, S Kapral.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to evaluate the sensory onset time and the quality of sensory block of ropivacaine, a new long-acting local anesthetic, compared with bupivacaine, for 3-in-1 blocks. Fifty ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing hip surgery after trauma were randomly assigned to two study groups of 25 patients each. The two study groups received a 3-in-1 block with either 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% or 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%. Blocks in both groups were performed using a nerve stimulator. The sensory onset time and the quality of sensory block was assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory region of each of the three nerves and compared with the same stimulation in the contralateral leg. We used a scale from 100% (normal sensation) to 0% (no sensory sensation). We did not find significant differences in sensory onset times between the ropivacaine group and the bupivacaine group (30+/-11 vs 32+/-10 min). The quality of sensory blocks was also comparable between the study groups (19%+/-20% vs 21%+/-15%). We conclude that the sensory onset time and quality of sensory block during 3-in-1 blocks performed with ropivacaine are comparable to those with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is described as being less potent than bupivacaine, making this local anesthetic promising for 3-in-1 blocks because of its reportedly lower incidence of cardiovascular and central nervous system complications. IMPLICATIONS: Ropivacaine 0.5% has a sensory onset time and quality of sensory block during 3-in-1 blocks similar to that of bupivacaine 0.5%. Ropivacaine is described as being less potent than bupivacaine, making it a promising local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks because of its reportedly lower cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10624992     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200001000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation Combined Versus Nerve Stimulation alone for Lumbar Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Xiao; Yan Fang; Yao Yu; Jian Li; Ya-Ru Luo; Yong Liu; Wei Mei
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 3.  Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J McClellan; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A guide to regional analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio A Rodriguez-Patarroyo; Nadin Cuello; Robert Molloy; Viktor Krebs; Alparslan Turan; Nicholas S Piuzzi
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Comparative evaluation of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for positioning during spinal anaesthesia in surgery of femur fracture.

Authors:  Ashok Jadon; Sunil Kumar Kedia; Shreya Dixit; Swastika Chakraborty
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  Regional analgesia modalities in abdominal and lower limb surgery - comparison of efficacy.

Authors:  Jasminka Peršec; Monika Šerić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

7.  Femoral nerve block versus fentanyl: Analgesia for positioning patients with fractured femur.

Authors:  Arissara Iamaroon; Manee Raksakietisak; Pathom Halilamien; Jitaporn Hongsawad; Kwankamol Boonsararuxsapong
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2010-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.