Literature DB >> 10624736

Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals.

D W Stashuk1.   

Abstract

Procedures for the quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic (EMG) signals detected simultaneously using selective or micro and non-selective or macro electrodes are presented. The procedures first involve the decomposition of the micro signals and then the quantitative analysis of the resulting motor unit action potential trains (MUAPTs) in conjunction with the associated macro signal. The decomposition procedures consist of a series of algorithms that are successively and iteratively applied to resolve a composite micro EMG signal into its constituent MUAPTs. The algorithms involve the detection of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs), MUAP clustering and supervised classification and they use shape and firing pattern information along with data dependent assignment criteria to obtain robust performance across a variety of EMG signals. The accuracy, extent and speed with which a set of 10 representative 20-30 s, concentric needle detected, micro signals could be decomposed are reported and discussed. The decomposition algorithms had a maximum and average error rate of 2.5% and 0.7%, respectively, on average assigned 88.7% of the detected MUAPs and took between 4 to 8 s. Quantitative analysis techniques involving average micro and macro MUAP shapes, the variability of micro MUAPs shapes and motor unit firing patterns are described and results obtained from analysis of the data set used to evaluate the decomposition algorithms are summarized and discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10624736     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(99)00064-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  39 in total

1.  Motor unit identification in two neighboring recording positions of the human trapezius muscle during prolonged computer work.

Authors:  Daniel Zennaro; Thomas Läubli; Helmut Krueger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Automatic identification of motor unit action potential trains from electromyographic signals using fuzzy techniques.

Authors:  E Chauvet; O Fokapu; J Y Hogrel; D Gamet; J Duchêne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Rigorous a posteriori assessment of accuracy in EMG decomposition.

Authors:  Kevin C McGill; Hamid R Marateb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Validating motor unit firing patterns extracted by EMG signal decomposition.

Authors:  Hossein Parsaei; Faezeh Jahanmiri Nezhad; Daniel W Stashuk; Andrew Hamilton-Wright
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals.

Authors:  Sarbast Rasheed; Daniel Stashuk; Mohamed Kamel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Electromyographic patterns suggest changes in motor unit physiology associated with early osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  S M Ling; R A Conwit; L Talbot; M Shermack; J E Wood; E M Dredge; M J Weeks; D R Abernethy; E J Metter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Equalization filters for multiple-channel electromyogram arrays.

Authors:  Edward A Clancy; Hongfang Xia; Anita Christie; Gary Kamen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Neurogenic changes in the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Julian P Saboisky; Daniel W Stashuk; Andrew Hamilton-Wright; Andrea L Carusona; Lisa M Campana; John Trinder; Danny J Eckert; Amy S Jordan; David G McSharry; David P White; Sanjeev Nandedkar; William S David; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Robust and accurate decoding of motoneuron behaviour and prediction of the resulting force output.

Authors:  Christopher K Thompson; Francesco Negro; Michael D Johnson; Matthew R Holmes; Laura Miller McPherson; Randall K Powers; Dario Farina; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Motor unit potential morphology differences in individuals with non-specific arm pain and lateral epicondylitis.

Authors:  Kristina M Calder; Daniel W Stashuk; Linda McLean
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.