Literature DB >> 10624256

Implementation of risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers as quality indicators for patients with hip fractures.

L Gunningberg1, C Lindholm, M Carlsson, P O Sjödén.   

Abstract

The aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fracture, on arrival at a Swedish hospital, at discharge, and two weeks post-surgery; (ii) to test whether clinical use of the Modified Norton Scale (MNS) could identify patients at risk for development of pressure ulcers; and (iii) to compare the reported prevalence of pressure ulcer in the experimental group, where risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers was performed on a daily basis, with that of the control group, where it was not. The study design was prospective, with an experimental and a control group. The intervention in the experimental group consisted of risk assessment, risk alarm and skin observation performed by the nurse on duty, in the A & E Department, and daily throughout the hospital stay. To facilitate the nurse's assessment, a 'Pressure Ulcer Card' was developed, consisting of the MNS and descriptions of the four stages of pressure ulcers. On arrival at the hospital, approximately 20% of patients in both groups had pressure ulcers. At discharge, the rate had increased to 40% (experimental) and 36% (control). Clinical use of the MNS made it possible to identify the majority of patients at risk for development of pressure ulcers. Patients who were confused on arrival developed significantly more pressure ulcers than patients who were orientated to time and place. No significant difference was found in the reported prevalence of pressure ulcers between the experimental and control groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10624256     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  7 in total

1.  Risk Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Development in Indian Surgical Wards.

Authors:  Sushma Kumari; Deborshi Sharma; Anshika Rana; Reetesh Pathak; Romesh Lal; Ajay Kumar; U C Biswal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Implementation of best practice in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in the acute orthopedic population.

Authors:  Karen E Campbell; M Gail Woodbury; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

4.  Hip fracture and pressure ulcers - the Pan-European Pressure Ulcer Study - intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors.

Authors:  Christina Lindholm; Eila Sterner; Marco Romanelli; Elaine Pina; Joan Torra y Bou; Helvi Hietanen; Ansa Iivanainen; Lena Gunningberg; Ami Hommel; Birgitta Klang; Carol Dealey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Care-related risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in elderly adults with hip fracture.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; Shayna E Rich; Michelle D Shardell; William G Hawkes; David J Margolis; Patricia Langenberg; Denise L Orwig; Mary H Palmer; Patricia S Jones; Robert Sterling; Bruce P Kinosian; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Oral health is essential for quality of life in older adults: A Swedish National Quality Register Study.

Authors:  Ulrika Lindmark; Marie Ernsth Bravell; Linda Johansson; Deborah Finkel
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Zena Eh Moore; Declan Patton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.