Literature DB >> 10623692

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells.

C H Weaver1, K A Schulman, B Wilson-Relyea, R Birch, W West, C D Buckner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81).
RESULTS: Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs.
CONCLUSION: It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10623692     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Use of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in high-dose cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paolo Anderlini; Richard Champlin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Nicole M Kuderer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients.

Authors:  P Quittet; P Ceballos; E Lopez; Z Y Lu; P Latry; C Becht; E Legouffe; N Fegueux; C Exbrayat; D Pouessel; V Rouillé; J P Daures; B Klein; J F Rossi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as a novel adjunct to improve hepatitis B vaccination.

Authors:  Sudeep Tanwar; Mark Thursz
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-27

6.  Spanish Society of Medical Oncology consensus for the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients.

Authors:  Alfredo Carrato; Luis Paz-Ares Rodríguez; Alvaro Rodríguez Lescure; Ana M Casas Fernández de Tejerina; Eduardo Díaz Rubio García; Pedro Pérez Segura; Manuel Constenla Figueiras; Rocío García Carbonero; José Gómez Codina; Ana Lluch Hernández; José Pablo Maroto Rey; Miguel Martín Jiménez; José Ignacio Mayordomo Cámara; José Andrés Moreno Nogueira; Antonio Rueda Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  A randomized pilot trial on the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on antibody response in hemodialysis patients who had not responded to routine hepatitis B virus vaccine.

Authors:  Jamshid Roozbeh; Kamran Bagheri-Lankarani; Poopak Mohaghegh; Ghanbarali Raeesjalali; Saeed Behzadi; Mehdi Sagheb; Mehrdad Vossoughi; Bahar Bastani
Journal:  J Nephropathol       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation - a literature review.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Salvino; Jefferson Ruiz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chengxin Luo; Guixian Wu; Xiangtao Huang; Yali Zhang; Yanni Ma; Yarui Huang; Zhen Huang; Hui Li; Yu Hou; Jieping Chen; Xi Li; Shuangnian Xu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 10.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: Growth factors or chemotherapy?

Authors:  Whitney D Wallis; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.