Literature DB >> 10623501

Do proteins learn to evolve? The Hopfield network as a basis for the understanding of protein evolution.

L Pritchard1, M J Dufton.   

Abstract

Correlations between amino-acid residues can be observed in sets of aligned protein sequences, and the analysis of their statistical and evolutionary significance and distribution has been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we present a model based on such covariations in protein sequences in which the pairs of residues that have mutual influence combine to produce a system analogous to a Hopfield neural network. The emergent properties of such a network, such as soft failure and the connection between network architecture and stored memory, have close parallels in known proteins. This model suggests that an explanation for observed characters of proteins such as the diminution of function by substitutions distant from the active site, the existence of protein folds (superfolds) that can perform several functions based on one architecture, and structural and functional resilience to destabilizing substitutions might derive from their inherent network-like structure. This model may also provide a basis for mapping the relationship between structure, function and evolutionary history of a protein family, and thus be a powerful tool for rational engineering. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10623501     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  8 in total

1.  CRASP: a program for analysis of coordinated substitutions in multiple alignments of protein sequences.

Authors:  Dmitry A Afonnikov; Nikolay A Kolchanov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses.

Authors:  Mario A Fares; Simon A A Travers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Force-clamp spectroscopy detects residue co-evolution in enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  Raul Perez-Jimenez; Arun P Wiita; David Rodriguez-Larrea; Pallav Kosuri; Jose A Gavira; Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz; Julio M Fernandez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Critical Components of the Wetware.

Authors:  Prakash Kulkarni; Supriyo Bhattacharya; Srisairam Achuthan; Amita Behal; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Sourabh Kotnala; Atish Mohanty; Govindan Rangarajan; Ravi Salgia; Vladimir Uversky
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 72.087

5.  Modelling celullar communication with scale-free networks.

Authors:  Radu Dobrescu; Victor Purcărea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

6.  Exploiting genomic knowledge in optimising molecular breeding programmes: algorithms from evolutionary computing.

Authors:  Steve O'Hagan; Joshua Knowles; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reducing the false positive rate in the non-parametric analysis of molecular coevolution.

Authors:  Francisco M Codoñer; Shirley O'Dea; Mario A Fares
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 8.  Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently.

Authors:  Andrew Currin; Neil Swainston; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.