Literature DB >> 10623039

Sample size calculations for trials in health services research.

J Wood1, M Lambert.   

Abstract

The current orthodox way of estimating sample size for a trial is through a power calculation based on a significance test. It therefore carries the assumption that this test should be the centerpiece of the statistical analysis. However, it is increasingly the case that confidence intervals are preferred to significance tests in summarising the results of trials, particularly in health services research. We believe that the way sample size is estimated should reflect this change and focus on the width of the confidence interval rather than on the outcome of a significance test. Such a method of estimation is described here and shown to have additional advantages of simplicity and transparency, enabling a more informed debate about the proposed size of trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10623039     DOI: 10.1177/135581969900400408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  3 in total

1.  Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable.

Authors:  Amy L Whitehead; Steven A Julious; Cindy L Cooper; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered?

Authors:  Ellen C Lee; Amy L Whitehead; Richard M Jacques; Steven A Julious
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Sweat and saliva cortisol response to stress and nutrition factors.

Authors:  Paul Pearlmutter; Gia DeRose; Cheyenne Samson; Nicholas Linehan; Yuqiao Cen; Lina Begdache; Daehan Won; Ahyeon Koh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.