Literature DB >> 10622388

Does the length of stay in the intensive care unit influence the diagnostic accuracy? A clinical-pathological study.

G Berlot1, R Dezzoni, M Viviani, L Silvestri, R Bussani, A Gullo.   

Abstract

To evaluate the rate of diagnostic errors leading to preventable deaths among patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU), we retrospectively reviewed the medical and autopsy records of all patients who died in the ICU between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 1993. Excluded were patients with traumatic injuries, cerebrovascular accidents and primary cardiac arrest. According to their length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, patients were subdivided into Group A (LOS 0-24 hours), Group B (LOS > 24 hours-14 days), and Group C (LOS > 14 days). Errors were divided into Type 1 (failure to recognize a treatable life-threatening condition); Type 2 (failure to recognize a life-threatening condition, which treated, however, would unlikely alter the outcome), and Type 3 (failure to recognize a condition unrelated to the outcome). Overall, 159 consecutive patients were enrolled. Type 1 errors were 5% in Group A, 4% in Group B and 9% in Group C. Type 2 errors were 18% in Group A, 34% in Group B, and 30% in Group C. Fully correct diagnoses or Type 3 errors were present in 77% of patients in Group A, 62% of patients in Group B, and 61% of patients in Group C. Clinical errors of any type were not related with the LOS in the ICU or in the hospital, age and the number of underlying chronic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10622388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Geriatric autopsy findings in the last 10 years: an Urban Teaching Hospital experience.

Authors:  Babak Shokrani; Marie N Fidelia-Lambert
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Major discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill cancer patients: Is autopsy still useful?

Authors:  Owais Khawaja; Mohammad Khalil; Omar Zmeili; Ayman O Soubani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2013-07

4.  Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephen M Pastores; Alina Dulu; Louis Voigt; Nina Raoof; Margarita Alicea; Neil A Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; Danny F McAuley; Sarah Davies; Fang Gao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.