Underestimation of the small residual damage when measuring DNA double-strand breaks (DSB): is the repair of radiation-induced DSB complete?

PURPOSE: To overcome the underestimation of the small residual damage when measuring DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) as fraction of activity released (FAR) by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The techniques used to assess DNA damage (e.g. pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, neutral elution, comet assay) do not directly measure the number of DSB. The Blöcher model can be used to express data as DSB after irradiation at 4 degrees C by calculating the distribution of all radiation-induced DNA fragments as a function of their size. We have used this model to measure the residual DSB (irradiation at 4 degrees C followed by incubation at 37 degrees C) in untransformed human fibroblasts.
RESULTS: The DSB induction rate after irradiation at 4 degrees C was 39.1+/-2.0 Gy(-1). The DSB repair rate obtained after doses of 10 to 80 Gy followed by repair times of 0 to 24 h was expressed as unrepaired DSB calculated from the Blöcher formula. All the damage appeared to be repaired at 24h when the data were expressed as FAR, whereas 15% of DSB remained unrepaired. The DSB repair rate and the chromosome break repair rate assessed by premature condensation chromosome (PCC) techniques were similar.
CONCLUSION: The expression of repair data in terms of FAR dramatically underestimates the amount of unrepaired DNA damage. The Blöcher model that takes into account the size distribution of radiation-induced DNA fragments should therefore be used to avoid this bias. Applied to a normal human fibroblast cell line, this model shows that DSB repair is never complete.