Literature DB >> 10621384

Criteria for evaluating alternative MEDLINE search engines.

M Jacobs1, A Edwards, R S Graves, E D Johnson.   

Abstract

With so many options available for searching MEDLINE on the World Wide Web or as a component of an online service, evaluation criteria are suggested as a means of assisting librarians in determining the positive and negative aspects of alternative MEDLINE sites. A set of searches was utilized to systematically compare MEDLINE sites. Sites evaluated included Avicenna, America Online, HealthGate, PubMed, Medscape, and Physicians' Online. Some features used to evaluate these sites were: default fields; operators (default); access to MeSH; subheadings; stop words protected in MeSH; truncation; and stemming. This article will describe the group process used to arrive at the evaluation criteria, as well as some general conclusions which will help librarians in directing their users to a particular MEDLINE site.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10621384     DOI: 10.1300/J115v17n03_01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q        ISSN: 0276-3869


  2 in total

1.  Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping: from the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists.

Authors:  Lora V Gault; Mary Shultz; Kathy J Davies
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-04

2.  Some benchmark searches for testing search capabilities and medical coverage of internet discovery tools.

Authors:  E D Johnson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.