OBJECTIVES: To examine models of informal support received by elders in the United States and Sweden and to test whether differences in informal support appear to stem from demographic differences between the nations alone or whether cultural and historical differences must also be considered. METHODS: Samples with similar functional dependence, age 75 and older in the United States (n = 4,677) and Sweden (n = 1,378), were used to model cross-national differences in the association between country, age, sex, potential availability of kin support, and receipt of informal assistance. RESULTS: Patterns of informal help were higher in the United States than in Sweden but were qualified by higher order interactions among age, sex, and availability of kin support. DISCUSSION: Cultural differences predating current policies in both countries appear to influence informal support over and above what can be accounted for by demographic differences alone.
OBJECTIVES: To examine models of informal support received by elders in the United States and Sweden and to test whether differences in informal support appear to stem from demographic differences between the nations alone or whether cultural and historical differences must also be considered. METHODS: Samples with similar functional dependence, age 75 and older in the United States (n = 4,677) and Sweden (n = 1,378), were used to model cross-national differences in the association between country, age, sex, potential availability of kin support, and receipt of informal assistance. RESULTS: Patterns of informal help were higher in the United States than in Sweden but were qualified by higher order interactions among age, sex, and availability of kin support. DISCUSSION: Cultural differences predating current policies in both countries appear to influence informal support over and above what can be accounted for by demographic differences alone.
Authors: Adam Davey; Elia E Femia; Steven H Zarit; Dennis G Shea; Gerdt Sundström; Stig Berg; Michael A Smyer; Jyoti Savla Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.077