M D Radmacher1, R Simon. 1. Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. mdradmac@helix.nih.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen is effective in preventing breast cancer. The largest such trial, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), reported a 49% reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer for the tamoxifen group. However, it is unclear whether the effect of tamoxifen in this trial was mainly due to prevention of newly forming tumors or to treatment of occult disease. METHODS: We used various tumor growth models (i.e., exponential and Gompertzian [growth limited by tumor size]) and a computer simulation to approximate the percentage of detected tumors that were initiated after study entry. Maximum likelihood techniques were then used to estimate separately the efficacy of tamoxifen in treating occult disease and in preventing the formation and growth of new tumors. RESULTS: Under the assumptions of most of the growth models, the trial was sufficiently long for substantial numbers of new tumors to form, grow, and be detected during the trial. With the Gompertzian model and all available incidence data from the BCPT, it was estimated that 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 40%-80%) fewer new tumors were detected in the tamoxifen group than in the placebo group. Likewise, 35% (95% CI = 6%-63%) fewer occult tumors were detected in the tamoxifen group. With this model, the estimated incidence rate of invasive breast cancer among women in the placebo group of the BCPT was 7.7 (95% CI = 6.6-8.9) per 1000 women per year. Similar results were obtained with three exponential tumor growth models. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the concept that tamoxifen reduced cancer incidence in the BCPT through both treatment of occult disease and prevention of new tumor formation and growth. However, data from prevention trials may never be sufficient to completely distinguish prevention of new tumor formation from treatment of occult disease.
BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen is effective in preventing breast cancer. The largest such trial, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), reported a 49% reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer for the tamoxifen group. However, it is unclear whether the effect of tamoxifen in this trial was mainly due to prevention of newly forming tumors or to treatment of occult disease. METHODS: We used various tumor growth models (i.e., exponential and Gompertzian [growth limited by tumor size]) and a computer simulation to approximate the percentage of detected tumors that were initiated after study entry. Maximum likelihood techniques were then used to estimate separately the efficacy of tamoxifen in treating occult disease and in preventing the formation and growth of new tumors. RESULTS: Under the assumptions of most of the growth models, the trial was sufficiently long for substantial numbers of new tumors to form, grow, and be detected during the trial. With the Gompertzian model and all available incidence data from the BCPT, it was estimated that 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 40%-80%) fewer new tumors were detected in the tamoxifen group than in the placebo group. Likewise, 35% (95% CI = 6%-63%) fewer occult tumors were detected in the tamoxifen group. With this model, the estimated incidence rate of invasive breast cancer among women in the placebo group of the BCPT was 7.7 (95% CI = 6.6-8.9) per 1000 women per year. Similar results were obtained with three exponential tumor growth models. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the concept that tamoxifen reduced cancer incidence in the BCPT through both treatment of occult disease and prevention of new tumor formation and growth. However, data from prevention trials may never be sufficient to completely distinguish prevention of new tumor formation from treatment of occult disease.
Authors: María Celeste Nicolao; María Celina Elissondo; Guillermo M Denegri; Alejandra B Goya; Andrea C Cumino Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Xiaobing Fan; Devkumar Mustafi; Marta Zamora; Jonathan N River; Sean Foxley; Gregory S Karczmar Journal: Phys Med Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 2.685
Authors: B P Will; K M Nobrega; J M Berthelot; W Flanagan; M C Wolfson; D M Logan; W K Evans Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-11-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: R Torrisi; L Baglietto; H Johansson; G Veronesi; B Bonanni; A Guerrieri-Gonzaga; B Ballardini; A Decensi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-12-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sara Darakhshan; Ali Bidmeshkipour; Kamran Mansouri; Hakhamaneshi Mohammad Saeid; Ali Ghanbari Journal: Iran J Pharm Res Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.696