Literature DB >> 10619938

Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomy.

H W Herr1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiographic with the surgical size of renal tumours selected for partial nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 50 patients undergoing elective partial nephrectomy for renal carcinoma (31 men and 19 women, preoperative tumour size 1.5-5. 2 cm) the maximum size of the renal tumour, as assessed from computed tomography (CT) before surgery, was compared with the tumour size at surgery. All patients had their renal artery temporarily occluded before surgery to shrink the kidney.
RESULTS: After partial nephrectomy, the renal tumours were a mean of 0.63 cm smaller than the estimate from CT; tumours of >/= 3.5 cm on CT were particularly reduced.
CONCLUSION: Incidentally discovered tumours on CT that are < 3.5 cm and favourably located are often selected for partial nephrectomy. If temporary vascular occlusion and surface hypothermia of the kidney causes shrinkage of most tumours of >/= 3. 5 cm, then surgeons might attempt partial nephrectomy in borderline cases, with a better chance of complete resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10619938     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Preoperative imaging in renal masses: does size on computed tomography correlate with actual tumor size?

Authors:  Ferhat Ateş; Ilker Akyol; Onur Sildiroglu; Zafer Kucukodaci; Hasan Soydan; Kenan Karademir; Kadir Baykal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.

Authors:  Sang Eun Lee; Won Ki Lee; Dae Sung Kim; Seung Hwan Doo; Hong Zoo Park; Cheol Yong Yoon; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparative analysis of radiologically measured size and true size of renal tumors.

Authors:  Kook Bin Lee; Sun Il Kim; Dae Sung Cho; Seong Kon Park; Hyun Ik Jang; Se Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-11-06

4.  Correlation between Radiologic and Pathologic Tumor Size in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Bum Soo Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Tae Gyun Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

5.  Contemporary imaging of patients with a renal mass: does size on computed tomography equal pathological size?

Authors:  Jordan M Kurta; R Houston Thompson; Shilajit Kundu; Matthew Kaag; M Thomas Manion; Harry W Herr; Paul Russo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Correcting the Shrinkage Effects of Formalin Fixation and Tissue Processing for Renal Tumors: toward Standardization of Pathological Reporting of Tumor Size.

Authors:  Thu Tran; Chandru P Sundaram; Clinton D Bahler; John N Eble; David J Grignon; M Francesca Monn; Novae B Simper; Liang Cheng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Implications of computer tomography measurement in the management of renal tumours.

Authors:  Rahul Mistry; Ramaswamy Manikandan; Penny Williams; Joe Philip; Peter Littler; Christopher S Foster; Keith F Parsons
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.