Literature DB >> 10619657

Different time course between scene processing and face processing: a MEG study.

N Sato1, K Nakamura, A Nakamura, M Sugiura, K Ito, H Fukuda, R Kawashima.   

Abstract

Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), the neural response to scenes was recorded and compared with that to faces. The prominent MEG signals in response to scenes appeared 200-300 ms after the stimulus presentation while those in response to faces appeared between 150 and 200 ms. Source locations of the signals were estimated in the right parahippocampal and parieto-occipital regions with a latency of 300 ms for the scene response, whereas those were estimated in the lingual or fusiform gyri bilaterally with a latency of 160 ms for the face response. These data suggest that both the temporal and parietal regions process scenes, while the occipito-temporal regions process faces, and that scene processing takes a longer time than face processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619657     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  10 in total

1.  A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Abraham Goldstein; Yuval Harpaz; Myriam Hansel; Elana Zion-Golumbic; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.

Authors:  Zainab Fatima; Natasha Kovacevic; Bratislav Misic; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Differences in Brain Hemodynamics in Response to Achromatic and Chromatic Cards of the Rorschach: A fMRI Study.

Authors:  Masahiro Ishibashi; Chigusa Uchiumi; Minyoung Jung; Naoki Aizawa; Kiyoshi Makita; Yugo Nakamura; Daisuke N Saito
Journal:  Rorschachiana       Date:  2016-06-10

5.  Different cortical dynamics in face and body perception: an MEG study.

Authors:  Hanneke K M Meeren; Beatrice de Gelder; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti S Hämäläinen; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Different hemispheric roles in recognition of happy expressions.

Authors:  Akinori Nakamura; Burkhard Maess; Thomas R Knösche; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Temporal Dynamics of Scene Processing: A Multifaceted EEG Investigation.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Iris I A Groen; Dwight J Kravitz; Leon Y Deouell; Chris I Baker
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-09-27

8.  Cortical sensitivity to natural scene structure.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Spatial frequency supports the emergence of categorical representations in visual cortex during natural scene perception.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Gavin Perry; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Mapping the Scene and Object Processing Networks by Intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Kamil Vlcek; Iveta Fajnerova; Tereza Nekovarova; Lukas Hejtmanek; Radek Janca; Petr Jezdik; Adam Kalina; Martin Tomasek; Pavel Krsek; Jiri Hammer; Petr Marusic
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.