Literature DB >> 10619001

Issues for academic health centers to consider before implementing a balanced-scorecard effort.

W N Zelman1, D Blazer, J M Gower, P O Bumgarner, L M Cancilla.   

Abstract

Because of changes in the health care environment, it is likely that strategic planning and management will become much more important to academic health centers (AHCs) than in the past. One approach to strategic planning and management that is gaining the considerable interest of health care organizations is the balanced scorecard. Based on a year's experience in examining this management tool, and on early implementation efforts, the authors critically evaluate the applicability of the balanced-scorecard approach at AHCs in relation to two fundamental questions: Does the decentralized nature of most AHCs mitigate the potential usefulness of the balanced-scorecard approach? Are the balanced scorecard's four perspectives (learning and growth, internal; customer; and financial) appropriate for AHCs, which are neither for-profit nor manufacturing organizations? The authors conclude that (1) the unique characteristics of AHCs may mitigate the full benefit of the balanced-scorecard approach, and (2) in cases where it is used, some key modifications must be made in the balanced-scorecard approach to account for those unique characteristics. For example, in a corporation, the key question from the financial perspective is "To succeed financially, how should we appear to our stockholders?" But in an AHC, this question must be revised to "What financial condition must we achieve to allow us to accomplish our mission?"

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619001     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199912000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The balanced scorecard. "Tool or toy" in hospitals].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; F Gebhard; R Isenmann; U Bothner; U Mohl; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Clinical pharmacy services: from cost-effectiveness analysis to a productivity indicators model.

Authors:  Adria Nogueras; Maria Isabel Chinchilla Fernández; Fernando Martínez; Faus Maria Jose; José Manuel Martínez Sesmero; José Luis Poveda Andrés; Miguel Ángel Calleja
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-07-04

4.  Balanced scorecards as a tool for developing patient-centered pharmacy services.

Authors:  Emmanuel N Enwere; Ellen A Keating; Robert J Weber
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-06

5.  Balanced performance measurement in research hospitals: the participative case study of a haematology department.

Authors:  Simona Catuogno; Claudia Arena; Sara Saggese; Fabrizia Sarto
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation.

Authors:  Victoria Bohm; Diane Lacaille; Nicole Spencer; Claire Eh Barber
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-07

7.  Achieving educational mission and vision with an educational scorecard.

Authors:  Jonathan Huntington; John F Dick; Hilary F Ryder
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  [Usefulness of the budget and the balanced scorecard in managing Primary Care Centres. Impact on staff motivation].

Authors:  Juan Manuel Ramón-Jerónimo; Raquel Flórez-López; Natalia Domínguez-Lario
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 1.137

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.