J A Staessen1, J G Wang, L Thijs, R Fagard. 1. Hypertensie en Cardiovasculaire Revalidatie Eenheid, Departement voor Moleculair en Cardiovasculair Onderzoek, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
AIMS: Isolated systolic hypertension affects over 8 to 15% of all subjects older than 60 years. In the elderly, systolic hypertension is the major modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Three placebo-controlled outcome trials on antihypertensive drug treatment of this disorder have been published. The aim of this article was to shortly review each of these three trials and to present the pooled estimates of benefit of antihypertensive drug treatment in isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) in the United States, the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial and the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) trial published their main findings in 1991, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The outcome results of these trials were pooled by calculating the common odds ratio for active versus placebo treatment for five major end-points. Zelen's exact test for homogeneity did not reach statistical significance for any of the end-points considered. Thus, the hypothesis of a common underlying treatment effect across the three trials was not rejected. Overall, active treatment compared with placebo, reduced all-cause mortality by 17%, cardiovascular mortality by 25%, all cardiovascular end-points by 32%, total stroke by 37% and myocardial infarction including sudden death by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled results of the outcome trials in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension prove that antihypertensive drug treatment must be prescribed, if on repeated measurement systolic blood pressure is 160 mm Hg or higher.
AIMS: Isolated systolic hypertension affects over 8 to 15% of all subjects older than 60 years. In the elderly, systolic hypertension is the major modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Three placebo-controlled outcome trials on antihypertensive drug treatment of this disorder have been published. The aim of this article was to shortly review each of these three trials and to present the pooled estimates of benefit of antihypertensive drug treatment in isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) in the United States, the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial and the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) trial published their main findings in 1991, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The outcome results of these trials were pooled by calculating the common odds ratio for active versus placebo treatment for five major end-points. Zelen's exact test for homogeneity did not reach statistical significance for any of the end-points considered. Thus, the hypothesis of a common underlying treatment effect across the three trials was not rejected. Overall, active treatment compared with placebo, reduced all-cause mortality by 17%, cardiovascular mortality by 25%, all cardiovascular end-points by 32%, total stroke by 37% and myocardial infarction including sudden death by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled results of the outcome trials in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension prove that antihypertensive drug treatment must be prescribed, if on repeated measurement systolic blood pressure is 160 mm Hg or higher.
Authors: Felix Gramley; Johann Lorenzen; Christian Knackstedt; Obaida R Rana; Erol Saygili; Dirk Frechen; Sven Stanzel; Francesco Pezzella; Eva Koellensperger; Christian Weiss; Thomas Münzel; Patrick Schauerte Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2008-10-07
Authors: Antonio Martínez Pastor; Mariano Leal Hernández; Luis Alberto Vara González; Luis Javier González Elena; Eduardo Paja Fano; Juan López Abril Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: William C Cushman; William E Brady; Lisa P Gazdick; Robert K Zeldin Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: John B Kostis; Jeanine E Sedjro; Javier Cabrera; Nora M Cosgrove; John S Pantazopoulos; William J Kostis; Sara L Pressel; Barry R Davis Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.738