Literature DB >> 10618591

Frontal and facial flatness of major human populations.

T Hanihara1.   

Abstract

In the present study, the frontal and facial features of 112 populations from around the world are compared in terms of frontal and facial flatness measurements. Univariate analyses and canonical correlation analysis were applied to six indices representing flatness of frontal and facial bones. The deep infraglabellar notch, marked prognathism, and flat frontal bone show distinctive Australian/Melanesian characters among recent populations. Very flat faces in the transverse plane are the most common condition in eastern Asians. Some subSaharan Africans share similar characteristics with Australians in terms of marked prognathism and flat frontal bones in the sagittal plane on the one hand, and with eastern Asians on the other hand, for flat nasal and zygomaxillary regions. These results are not necessarily inconsistent with the evidence for regional continuity. The examination of relationships between frontal and facial flatness through canonical correlation analysis reveals a significant association between morphological features such as a deep infraglabellar notch, prognathism, flat frontal bone, and flat faces in the transverse plane. In this context, together with the generalized features of the late Pleistocene fossil record, the features of Australians having transversely projecting faces and of eastern Asians showing weak infraglabellar notches, ortho-/mosognathism, and rounded frontal bones can be interpreted as a differential retention of ancestral traits of anatomically modern humans. This may allow us to suppose that the frontal and facial flatness features treated herein can be explained by the hypothesis of a single origin of anatomically modern humans. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10618591     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200001)111:1<105::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  12 in total

1.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

2.  Deficiency of zebrafish fgf20a results in aberrant skull remodeling that mimics both human cranial disease and evolutionarily important fish skull morphologies.

Authors:  W James Cooper; Rachel M Wirgau; Elly M Sweet; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  A cephalometric study of skulls from the Bahriyah oasis.

Authors:  Moushira Erfan Zaki; Muhammad Al-Tohamy Soliman; Hala T El-Bassyouni
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2012-07

4.  Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.

Authors:  Marina L Sardi; Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Indian craniometric variability and affinities.

Authors:  Pathmanathan Raghavan; David Bulbeck; Gayathiri Pathmanathan; Suresh Kanta Rathee
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics.

Authors:  Chimène Chalala; Maria Saadeh; Fouad Ayoub
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Craniometrics Reveal "Two Layers" of Prehistoric Human Dispersal in Eastern Eurasia.

Authors:  Hirofumi Matsumura; Hsiao-Chun Hung; Charles Higham; Chi Zhang; Mariko Yamagata; Lan Cuong Nguyen; Zhen Li; Xue-Chun Fan; Truman Simanjuntak; Adhi Agus Oktaviana; Jia-Ning He; Chung-Yu Chen; Chien-Kuo Pan; Gang He; Guo-Ping Sun; Wei-Jin Huang; Xin-Wei Li; Xing-Tao Wei; Kate Domett; Siân Halcrow; Kim Dung Nguyen; Hoang Hiep Trinh; Chi Hoang Bui; Khanh Trung Kien Nguyen; Andreas Reinecke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Divided zygoma in Holocene human populations from Northern China.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Quanchao Zhang; Shiyu Yang; Paul C Dechow; Hong Zhu; Hui-Yuan Yeh; Qian Wang
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Discrepancy between cranial and DNA data of early Americans: implications for American peopling.

Authors:  S Ivan Perez; Valeria Bernal; Paula N Gonzalez; Marina Sardi; Gustavo G Politis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cranio-morphometric and aDNA corroboration of the Austronesian dispersal model in ancient Island Southeast Asia: Support from Gua Harimau, Indonesia.

Authors:  Hirofumi Matsumura; Ken-Ichi Shinoda; Truman Shimanjuntak; Adhi Agus Oktaviana; Sofwan Noerwidi; Harry Octavianus Sofian; Dyah Prastiningtyas; Lan Cuong Nguyen; Tsuneo Kakuda; Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama; Noboru Adachi; Hsiao-Chun Hung; Xuechun Fan; Xiujie Wu; Anna Willis; Marc F Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.