Literature DB >> 10618557

Rationale and design of the OPTIME CHF trial: outcomes of a prospective trial of intravenous milrinone for exacerbations of chronic heart failure.

M S Cuffe1, R M Califf, K F Adams, R C Bourge, W Colucci, B Massie, C M O'Connor, I Pina, R Quigg, M Silver, L A Robinson, J D Leimberger, M Gheorghiade.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of an acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure (CHF) is uncertain. There is little randomized evidence available to support the various treatment strategies for patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of CHF. Inotropic agents may produce beneficial hemodynamic effects, and although they are currently used in these patients, their effect on clinical response and impact on clinical outcome is unclear. We present a unique and simple study designed to determine whether a treatment strategy for CHF exacerbations that includes an intravenous agent with inotropic properties can reduce hospital length of stay and lead to improved patient outcome.
METHODS: The OPTIME CHF (Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure) trial is an ongoing multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a treatment strategy for patients with acute exacerbations of CHF. The design of this study provides a novel approach to the evaluation of treatment strategies in the care of this population. The OPTIME CHF design uses early initiation of intravenous milrinone as both an adjunct to the best the medical therapy and to facilitate optimal dosing of standard oral therapy for heart failure. Patients with known systolic heart failure requiring hospital admission for a CHF exacerbation are randomly assigned within 48 hours of admission to receive a 48-hour infusion of either intravenous milrinone or placebo. The primary end point of this design is a reduction in the total hospital days for cardiovascular events within 60 days after therapy. Enrollment of 1000 patients began July 7, 1997, at 80 US centers and is projected to conclude in late 1999.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10618557     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90303-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

1.  Usefulness of acetazolamide in the management of diuretic resistance.

Authors:  Dalvir Gill; Naga Vaishnavi Gadela; Ayesha Azmeen; Abhishek Jaiswal
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in assessing and selecting congestive heart failure therapies.

Authors:  Emile Levy; Pierre Levy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Levosimendan: A promising agent for the treatment of hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  L Lehtonen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous inotropic agents.

Authors:  Lasse A Lehtonen; Saila Antila; Pertti J Pentikäinen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  What can we learn from RELAX-AHF compared to previous AHF trials and what does the future hold?

Authors:  Jane A Cannon; Andrew R McKean; Pardeep S Jhund; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-12-23

Review 6.  Assessment and prevalence of pulmonary oedema in contemporary acute heart failure trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elke Platz; Pardeep S Jhund; Ross T Campbell; John J McMurray
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 7.  Renal dysfunction in heart failure patients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Heath E Saltzman; Kumar Sharma; Paul J Mather; Sharon Rubin; Suzanne Adams; David Joshua Whellan
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.