Literature DB >> 10617879

Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts I. Clinical results.

B Battiston1, P Tos, T R Cushway, S Geuna.   

Abstract

Peripheral nerve lesions with a long segment defect need a grafting conduit to heal. Although autogenous nerve grafting is still considered the best method for bridging nerve defects, several alternative types of conduits (biological and synthetic) have been studied. We have demonstrated in previous experimental research in rats that a graft made using a vein (providing a guide for nerve regeneration) filled with fresh skeletal muscle (to prevent vein collapse and support axon regeneration) gave similar results to traditional nerve grafts. On this basis, we decided to use the muscle-vein-combined grafts in clinical cases. From 1993 to 1997, this technique was applied for bridging both sensory and mixed nerve defects (21 cases). We report good results in 85% of our cases with a minimum follow-up of 14 months. These results, obtained on nerve defects ranging from 0.5 to 6 cm in length, seem to be superior to those reported with other kinds of artificial or biological conduits. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10617879     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(2000)20:1<32::aid-micr6>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  15 in total

1.  Local delivery of the Neuregulin1 receptor ecto-domain (ecto-ErbB4) has a positive effect on regenerated nerve fiber maturation.

Authors:  G Gambarotta; D Pascal; G Ronchi; M Morano; S B Jager; S Moimas; L Zentilin; M Giacca; I Perroteau; P Tos; S Geuna; S Raimondo
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  Biomaterials for the development of peripheral nerve guidance conduits.

Authors:  Alexander R Nectow; Kacey G Marra; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  The amnion muscle combined graft (AMCG) conduits in nerves repair: an anatomical and experimental study on a rat model.

Authors:  Andrea Marchesini; Stefania Raimondo; Nicola Zingaretti; Valentina Riccio; Bruno Battiston; Mauro Provinciali; Stefano Geuna; Michele Riccio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biofabrication and testing of a fully cellular nerve graft.

Authors:  Christopher M Owens; Francoise Marga; Gabor Forgacs; Cheryl M Heesch
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing muscle-in-vein conduits with autologous nerve grafts for nerve reconstruction.

Authors:  Johannes C Heinzel; Mai Quyen Nguyen; Laura Kefalianakis; Cosima Prahm; Adrien Daigeler; David Hercher; Jonas Kolbenschlag
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Venous graft-derived cells participate in peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Mitra Lavasani; Sebastian Gehrmann; Burhan Gharaibeh; Katherine A Clark; Robert A Kaufmann; Bruno Péault; Robert J Goitz; Johnny Huard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Update on nerve repair by biological tubulization.

Authors:  Stefano Geuna; Pierluigi Tos; Paolo Titolo; Davide Ciclamini; Teresa Beningo; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2014-03-07

8.  Emerging issues in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Stefano Geuna; Pierluigi Tos; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Use of vein conduit and isolated nerve graft in peripheral nerve repair: a comparative study.

Authors:  Imran Ahmad; Md Sohaib Akhtar
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-10-27

10.  Influence of immobilization and sensory re-education on the sensory recovery after reconstruction of digital nerves with direct suture or muscle-in-vein conduits.

Authors:  Theodora Manoli; Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Lukas Schulz; Thomas Fuchsberger; Hans-Eberhard Schaller
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.