Literature DB >> 10617732

Hawaii's healthy start program of home visiting for at-risk families: evaluation of family identification, family engagement, and service delivery.

A Duggan1, A Windham, E McFarlane, L Fuddy, C Rohde, S Buchbinder, C Sia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe family identification, family engagement, and service delivery in a statewide home visiting program for at-risk families of newborns.
SETTING: Six target communities of Hawaii's Healthy Start Program (HSP), which incorporates 1) early identification of at-risk families of newborns via population-based screening and assessment, and 2) paraprofessional home visiting to improve family functioning, promote child health and development, and prevent child maltreatment.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study: describes early identification process and family characteristics associated with initial enrollment. Longitudinal study: describes home visiting process and characteristics associated with continued participation.
SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional study: civilian births in 6 communities (n = 6553). Longitudinal study: at-risk families in the intervention group of a randomized trial of the HSP (n = 373). PROCESS: completeness and timeliness of early identification and home visiting activities; family characteristics: sociodemographics, child abuse risk factors, infant biologic risk.
RESULTS: Early identification staff determined risk status for 84% of target families. Families with higher risk scores, young mothers with limited schooling, and families with infants at biologic risk were more likely to enroll in home visiting. Half of those who enrolled were active at 1 year with an average of 22 visits. Families where the father had multiple risk factors and where the mother was substance abusing were more likely to have >/=12 visits; mothers who were unilaterally violent toward the father were less likely. Most families were linked with a medical home; linkage rates for other community resources varied widely by type of service. Half of families overall, but >/=80% of those active at 1 year, received core home visiting services. Performance varied by program site.
CONCLUSIONS: It is challenging to engage and retain at-risk families in home visiting. Service monitoring must be an integral part of operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10617732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  48 in total

1.  Screening for family and intimate partner violence: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Seven-month pilot of an integrated, continuous evaluation, and quality improvement system for a state-based home-visiting program.

Authors:  Bridget K McCabe; Dru Potash; Ellen Omohundro; Cathy R Taylor
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

3.  Understanding maternal intentions to engage in home visiting programs.

Authors:  Karen McCurdy; Deborah Daro; Elizabeth Anisfeld; Aphra Katzev; Ann Keim; Craig Lecroy; Courtney McAfee; Carnot Nelson; Lydia Falconnier; William M McGuigan; Jennifer K Park; James Sandy; Carolyn Winje
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  Service Engagement and Retention: Lessons from the Early Childhood Connections Program.

Authors:  Chien-Jen Chiang; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Hyunil Kim; Brett Drake; Laura Pons; Patricia Kohl; John Constantino; Wendy Auslander
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2018-02-19

5.  Provider cultural competency, client satisfaction, and engagement in home-based programs to treat child abuse and neglect.

Authors:  Amy Damashek; David Bard; Debra Hecht
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2011-10-17

6.  Risk factors for intimate partner violence initiation and persistence among high psychosocial risk Asian and Pacific Islander women in intact relationships.

Authors:  Sarah Shea Crowne; Hee-Soon Juon; Margaret Ensminger; Megan H Bair-Merritt; Anne Duggan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-10-17

7.  Association of maternal and community factors with enrollment in home visiting among at-risk, first-time mothers.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; David E Jones; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Jodie A Short; Robert T Ammerman; Judith B Van Ginkel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Preventing child maltreatment: Examination of an established statewide home-visiting program.

Authors:  Barbara H Chaiyachati; Julie R Gaither; Marcia Hughes; Karen Foley-Schain; John M Leventhal
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 9.  Screening children for family violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Peggy Nygren; Heidi D Nelson; Jonathan Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Braiding Two Evidence-based Programs for Families at-risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kate Guastaferro; Betty S Lai; Katy Miller; Jenelle Shanley Chatham; Daniel J Whitaker; Shannon Self-Brown; Allison Kemner; John R Lutzker
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2017-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.