Literature DB >> 10617017

Comparison of outcomes between living donor and cadaveric lung transplantation in children.

V A Starnes1, M S Woo, E F MacLaughlin, M V Horn, P C Wong, J M Rowland, C L Durst, W J Wells, M L Barr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival in lung transplant is limited by bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS). We compared outcomes in pediatric living donor bilateral lobar (LL) vs cadaveric lung transplant (CL).
METHODS: Children were studied who had LL or CL with at least 1 year follow-up. Data collected included acute rejection episodes, pulmonary function tests (PFT), BOS, and survival. Mean age was 13.36+/-3.16 years in LL and 12.00+/-4.19 years in CL patients (p = 0.37, ns).
RESULTS: There was no difference in rejection (p = 0.41, ns). CL had rejection earlier (2.48+/-3.84 months) than LL (13.60+/-10.74 months; p = 0.02). There was no difference in 12 month PFT. But at 24 months, LL had greater forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.001) and FEF25-71% (p = 0.01) than CL. BOS was found in 0/14 LL vs 9/11 (82%) CL after 1 year (p = 0.04). After 2 years, 0/8 LL and 6/7 (86%) CL had BOS (p < 0.05). LL had 85% survival vs 79% for CL at 12 months. At 24 months, LL survival was 77% vs 67% for CL.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric LL had less BOS and better pulmonary function than CL. As BOS is a determinant of long-term outcome, we believe LL is the preferred lung transplant method for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10617017     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01155-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lung transplantation: opportunities for research and clinical advancement.

Authors:  David S Wilkes; Thomas M Egan; Herbert Y Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  One year follow-up of the first bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation in Japan.

Authors:  H Date; H Yamamoto; M Yamashita; M Aoe; K Kubo; N Shimizu
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-10

3.  Objective assessment of criteria for selection of donor lungs suitable for transplantation.

Authors:  A J Fisher; S C Donnelly; G Pritchard; J H Dark; P A Corris
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Favorable outcomes after living-donor lobar lung transplantation in ventilator-dependent patients.

Authors:  Shinichi Toyooka; Masaomi Yamane; Takahiro Oto; Yoshifumi Sano; Megumi Okazaki; Motohiko Hanazaki; Keiji Goto; Hiroshi Date
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Pediatric lung transplantation: promise being realized.

Authors:  Carol Conrad; David N Cornfield
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 6.  Living-donor lobar lung transplantation.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakajima; Hiroshi Date
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.