Literature DB >> 10616938

Responses to depression in unipolar depressed patients: an investigation of Nolen-Hoeksema's response styles theory.

C Kuehner1, I Weber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The response styles theory suggests that rumination in response to depressed mood exacerbates and prolongs depression, while distraction ameliorates and shortens it. Gender differences in response styles are said to contribute to the observed gender differences in the prevalence of unipolar depression. While empirical support for the theory has been found from a variety of non-clinical studies, its generalizability to clinically depressed patient populations remains unclear.
METHODS: A cohort of 52 unipolar depressed in-patients was assessed with the Response Styles Questionnaire during in-patient stay (T1) and 4 weeks after discharge (T2). The patients were followed up 4 months after discharge (T3). Clinical assessment included the SCAN-PSE-10.
RESULTS: Moderate and statistically significant retest-stabilities for rumination and distraction were found, comparable for patients with stable and changing depression status from T1 to T2. A cross-sectional diagnosis of a major depressive episode was associated with rumination, while gender was not. Post-discharge baseline rumination (T2), adjusted for concurrent depression, predicted follow-up levels of depression (T3), and, in patients who were non-remitted at post-discharge baseline, it predicted presence of a major depressive episode at follow-up (T3). Results on distraction were more ambiguous.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that rumination is likely to have a deteriorating impact on the course of clinical episodes of depression in unipolar depressed patients. Larger longitudinal patient studies are needed to validate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616938     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799001282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  51 in total

Review 1.  Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: toward biomarkers of treatment response.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Association of parental depression with psychiatric course from adolescence to young adulthood among formerly depressed individuals.

Authors:  Paul Rohde; Peter M Lewinsohn; Daniel N Klein; John R Seeley
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought.

Authors:  Edward R Watkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  The default mode network and recurrent depression: a neurobiological model of cognitive risk factors.

Authors:  Igor Marchetti; Ernst H W Koster; Edmund J Sonuga-Barke; Rudi De Raedt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Evolutionary psychiatry and depression: testing two hypotheses.

Authors:  Somogy Varga
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-02

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression.

Authors:  Seth G Disner; Christopher G Beevers; Emily A P Haigh; Aaron T Beck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Behavioral activation sensitivity and default mode network-subgenual cingulate cortex connectivity in youth.

Authors:  Allesandra S Iadipaolo; Hilary A Marusak; Kelsey Sala-Hamrick; Laura M Crespo; Moriah E Thomason; Christine A Rabinak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Differential association of default mode network connectivity and rumination in healthy individuals and remitted MDD patients.

Authors:  Giannis Lois; Michèle Wessa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  An attentional scope model of rumination.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Ruminative self-focus and negative affect: an experience sampling study.

Authors:  Nicholas J Moberly; Edward R Watkins
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2008-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.