Literature DB >> 10616353

Incidence of gonorrhoea diagnosed in GUM clinics in South Thames (west) region.

M Hickman1, A Judd, H Maguire, P Hay, A Charlett, M Catchpole, A Nayagam, A Renton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of gonorrhoea diagnosed in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in South Thames (West) between 1995 and 1996, and how it changed among population subgroups. SETTINGS AND
SUBJECTS: Cases of uncomplicated and complicated gonorrhoea diagnosed at 13 GUM clinics in the former South Thames West (STW) Regional Health Authority that reported disaggregate data to the South Thames GUM Clinic Collaborative STD Surveillance Scheme.
METHODS: Annual incidence rates (per 100,000) of gonorrhoea diagnoses by sex, age group, ethnic group, area of residence, and year were calculated. Poisson regression models were used to calculate risk ratios (RR) to describe the key differences in the variation of gonorrhoea cases by these variables. Relative differences in the incidence of diagnosed gonorrhoea between 1995 and 1996 were investigated by including an interaction between year and the other variables (age group, sex, ethnic group, region) and testing whether any were significant using a likelihood ratio test.
RESULTS: Area of residence, sex, age group, and ethnic group were key predictors of the rates of diagnosed gonorrhoea. The risk ratio for gonorrhoea (after adjustment for the other variables) was: 13 times higher among blacks than the white population; twice as high in inner London compared with outer London; and three times lower in the "shire" region compared with outer London. The rate of diagnosed gonorrhoea was significantly higher in the black population in the shire region than the inner London white population. The rate of gonorrhoea diagnosed by GUM clinics from 1995 to 1996 almost doubled in the white population aged 15-44 years, from 16 cases per 100,000 to 30 cases per 100,000 (adjusted RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.4), whereas increased rates in the black and Asian/other ethnic groups were not statistically significant (adjusted RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4; and 1.4, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.7 respectively).
CONCLUSION: The observed increase in gonorrhoea between 1995 and 1996 occurred mostly among heterosexual white men and women. Overall, the rates of gonorrhoea among young people, especially in the black population and in inner London represent a significant public health problem that may merit further targeted interventions, the effectiveness of which could be monitored through further development of routine surveillance data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616353      PMCID: PMC1758235          DOI: 10.1136/sti.75.5.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  14 in total

1.  Resurgent gonorrhoea in homosexual men.

Authors:  V C Riley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Resurgent gonorrhoea in homosexual men.

Authors:  M A Waugh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Race and ethnicity in STD analyses.

Authors:  M W Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Evidence for recent changes in sexual behaviour in homosexual men in England and Wales.

Authors:  A M Johnson; O N Gill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Analysis of the sociodemography of gonorrhoea in Leeds, 1989-93.

Authors:  C J Lacey; D W Merrick; D C Bensley; I Fairley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-14

6.  The impact of sexually transmitted diseases on minority populations.

Authors:  J S Moran; S O Aral; W C Jenkins; T A Peterman; E R Alexander
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Using STD occurrence to monitor AIDS prevention.

Authors:  A M Renton; L Whitaker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Sociodemographic distribution of gonorrhea incidence: implications for prevention and behavioral research.

Authors:  R J Rice; P L Roberts; H H Handsfield; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The geography of gonorrhea. Empirical demonstration of core group transmission.

Authors:  R B Rothenberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Geographic variation in sexual behaviour in Britain: implications for sexually transmitted disease epidemiology and sexual health promotion.

Authors:  J Wadsworth; M Hickman; A M Johnson; K Wellings; J Field
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regional differences in chlamydia and gonorrhoeae positivity rate among heterosexual STI clinic visitors in the Netherlands: contribution of client and regional characteristics as assessed by cross-sectional surveillance data.

Authors:  Hannelore M Götz; Louise Aam van Oeffelen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Birgit Hb van Benthem
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A metapopulation modelling framework for gonorrhoea and other sexually transmitted infections in heterosexual populations.

Authors:  Mark I Chen; Azra C Ghani; W John Edmunds
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  What can be gained from comprehensive disaggregate surveillance? The Avon Surveillance System for Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Wendi Slater; Katharine Sadler; Jackie A Cassell; Paddy Horner; Nicola Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.