Literature DB >> 10616227

A comparison of subjective estimates of sleep with objective polysomnographic data in healthy men and women.

F C Baker1, S Maloney, H S Driver.   

Abstract

Twenty healthy men and women had their sleep recorded objectively, using polysomnography on 3 nonconsecutive nights. Following each night, the subjects assessed their sleep onset latency and number of awakenings, subjectively. Self-ratings were compared with objective measures of sleep onset latency (SOL), calculated as the time from lights-out to the first continuous minute of stage 2 sleep, and the number of awakenings which lasted 1 minute or longer on the polysomnograms. Apart from the first night, the subjects overestimated the time that it took them to fall asleep, despite sleep onset being scored as the latency to stage 2, rather than stage 1 sleep. On all 3 nights, the subjects underestimated the number of awakenings when compared to objective criteria. Although the subjects were consistent in their errors of estimation of their sleep compared to polysomnographic assessments over the three nights, the between-individual variation was large, so that objective and subjective ratings of SOL and awakenings were not correlated. The young men and women in our study, who were free of medication or sleep complaints, perceived their sleep inaccurately when compared to objective polysomnographic recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616227     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00017-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  54 in total

1.  Perception of sleep: subjective versus objective sleep parameters in patients with Parkinson's disease in comparison with healthy elderly controls. Sleep perception in Parkinson's disease and controls.

Authors:  Svenja Happe; Gerhard Klösch; José Lorenzo; Dieter Kunz; Thomas Penzel; Joachim Röschke; S-L Himanen; Georg Gruber; Josef Zeitlhofer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Actual and perceived sleep: associations with daytime functioning among postpartum women.

Authors:  Salvatore P Insana; Elizabeth E Stacom; Hawley E Montgomery-Downs
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-11-21

3.  Sleep in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of actigraphy and subjective measures.

Authors:  K Stavitsky; J L Saurman; P McNamara; A Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.891

4.  Sleep discrepancy, sleep complaint, and poor sleep among older adults.

Authors:  Jacob M Williams; Daniel B Kay; Meredeth Rowe; Christina S McCrae
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Habitual and Recent Sleep Durations: Graded and Interactive Risk for Impaired Glycemic Control in a Biracial Population.

Authors:  Donald L Bliwise; Sophia A Greer; Michael K Scullin; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The Contribution of Psychosocial Stressors to Sleep among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Dayna A Johnson; Lynda Lisabeth; Tené T Lewis; Mario Sims; DeMarc A Hickson; Tandaw Samdarshi; Herman Taylor; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Relationship between reported and measured sleep times: the sleep heart health study (SHHS).

Authors:  Graciela E Silva; James L Goodwin; Duane L Sherrill; Jean L Arnold; Richard R Bootzin; Terry Smith; Joyce A Walsleben; Carol M Baldwin; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  A decade's difference: 10-year change in insomnia symptom prevalence in Canada depends on sociodemographics and health status.

Authors:  Sheila N Garland; Hillary Rowe; Lily M Repa; Ken Fowler; Eric S Zhou; Michael A Grandner
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2018-02-19

9.  Relationships among dietary nutrients and subjective sleep, objective sleep, and napping in women.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Daniel F Kripke; Nirinjini Naidoo; Robert D Langer
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 10.  How disturbed sleep may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Michele L Okun; James M Roberts; Anna L Marsland; Martica Hall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.