AIMS: We review recent trends in HIV associated with injecting drug use (IDU) in the Newly Independent States (NIS) in eastern Europe, including Belarus, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan in central Asia. We aim to draw attention to the social and economic "risk environments" in which rapid HIV spread among IDUs has occurred. METHODS: Findings draw on centrally registered HIV surveillance data, published research studies and assessment reports funded by international development agencies. FINDINGS: Since 1995, there is evidence of rapid HIV spread in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine, with estimates suggesting between 50% and 90% of new HIV infections among IDUs. At the same time, there have been rapid increases in the incidence of syphilis and declines in health and welfare status, including outbreaks of diphtheria, tuberculosis and cholera. Findings emphasize the potential influence of the social and economic context in creating the "risk environments" conducive to HIV and epidemic spread. Key factors include: rapid diffusions in IDU; population migration and mixing; economic transition and decline; increasing unemployment and impoverishment; the growth of informal economies; modes of drug production, distribution and consumption; declines in public health revenue and infrastructure; and political, ideological and cultural transition. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of the social and economic contexts mediating HIV spread is a prerequiste to identifying the environmental "pre-conditions" of epidemic outbreaks, and thus also, for predicting and preventing HIV transmission. The "risk environment" may influence the efficacy of individual and community-level HIV prevention and highlights the concomitant urgency for interventions targeting social and environmental change.
AIMS: We review recent trends in HIV associated with injecting drug use (IDU) in the Newly Independent States (NIS) in eastern Europe, including Belarus, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan in central Asia. We aim to draw attention to the social and economic "risk environments" in which rapid HIV spread among IDUs has occurred. METHODS: Findings draw on centrally registered HIV surveillance data, published research studies and assessment reports funded by international development agencies. FINDINGS: Since 1995, there is evidence of rapid HIV spread in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine, with estimates suggesting between 50% and 90% of new HIV infections among IDUs. At the same time, there have been rapid increases in the incidence of syphilis and declines in health and welfare status, including outbreaks of diphtheria, tuberculosis and cholera. Findings emphasize the potential influence of the social and economic context in creating the "risk environments" conducive to HIV and epidemic spread. Key factors include: rapid diffusions in IDU; population migration and mixing; economic transition and decline; increasing unemployment and impoverishment; the growth of informal economies; modes of drug production, distribution and consumption; declines in public health revenue and infrastructure; and political, ideological and cultural transition. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of the social and economic contexts mediating HIV spread is a prerequiste to identifying the environmental "pre-conditions" of epidemic outbreaks, and thus also, for predicting and preventing HIV transmission. The "risk environment" may influence the efficacy of individual and community-level HIV prevention and highlights the concomitant urgency for interventions targeting social and environmental change.
Entities:
Keywords:
Behavior; Diseases; Drug Usage; Economic Factors; Epidemics; Evaluation; Hiv Infections; Iv Drug Users; New Independent States; Research Report; Risk Assessment; Socioeconomic Factors; Viral Diseases
Authors: Richard H Needle; Robert T Trotter; Merrill Singer; Christopher Bates; J Bryan Page; David Metzger; Louis H Marcelin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Scott Burris; Kim M Blankenship; Martin Donoghoe; Susan Sherman; Jon S Vernick; Patricia Case; Zita Lazzarini; Stephen Koester Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Vickie M Mays; Richard Jimenez; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Robert E Booth; Wayne E K Lehman; Carl A Latkin; Sergey Dvoryak; John T Brewster; Mark S Royer; Larisa Sinitsyna Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lucy Platt; Tim Rhodes; Ali Judd; Evgeniya Koshkina; Svetlana Maksimova; Natalia Latishevskaya; Adrian Renton; Tamara McDonald; John V Parry Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Richard F Armenta; Alexis M Roth; Karla D Wagner; Steffanie A Strathdee; Stephanie K Brodine; Jazmine Cuevas-Mota; Fatima A Munoz; Richard S Garfein Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.671