Literature DB >> 10615495

Velocity tuned mechanisms in human motion processing.

T E Reisbeck1, K R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

We determined two-dimensional motion discrimination contours in the spatio-temporal frequency plane to characterize the mechanisms underlying velocity perception. In particular, we wanted to determine whether there exist mechanisms tuned specifically to velocity, rather than separable mechanisms tuned to spatial and temporal frequency. A 4-AFC paradigm was used to determine spatio-temporal frequency discrimination thresholds for moving sinewave gratings defined by luminance contrast. Three of the grating patches used were defined by the same spatial and temporal frequency (standard), the other (test) differed by a fixed proportional change in spatial and temporal frequency. Subjects had to indicate which grating differed most from the others and the thresholds determined for varying proportions of change in spatial and temporal frequency were used to trace out complete threshold contours in the plane spanned by these attributes. Some of the contours, primarily at speeds above 1 deg/s, were noticeably oriented along lines of constant velocity. To further isolate these mechanisms, spatio-temporal noise was added to the standard stimuli either along a line of constant velocity or in the direction orthogonal to it. When spatio-temporal noise of constant velocity was added to the standard stimuli, threshold contours became elongated only along the direction of the noise. The same amount of noise in the orthogonal direction produced an overall increase in thresholds without changing the shape of the contour, presenting clear evidence for velocity tuned mechanisms. In further experiments we discovered that velocity tuned mechanisms interact with separable mechanisms to produce optimal discriminability. Analogous experiments with isoluminant stimuli failed to exhibit evidence for velocity tuning, supporting the notion that the human color vision system is impaired in its coding of stimulus speed, despite excellent sensitivity to direction of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615495     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel M Drucker; Wesley Thomas Kerr; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Can speed be judged independent of direction?

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Rory Trevelyan Thomas; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  More is not always better: adaptive gain control explains dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  Claudio Simoncini; Laurent U Perrinet; Anna Montagnini; Pascal Mamassian; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Discrimination contours for the perception of head-centered velocity.

Authors:  Rebecca A Champion; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Reconstruction of target speed for the guidance of pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  N J Priebe; M M Churchland; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Four-day-old human neonates look longer at non-biological motions of a single point-of-light.

Authors:  David Méary; Elenitsa Kitromilides; Karine Mazens; Christian Graff; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The neural representation of speed in macaque area MT/V5.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Carlos R Cassanello; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.