Literature DB >> 10615442

Repeatability of measurements of interpupillary distance.

B J Holland1, J Siderov.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intra-examiner repeatability of measurements of interpupillary distance (IPD). Three methods were used: Viktorin's, corneal reflection, and pupillometer. In Experiment 1, an experienced optometrist measured IPD on forty-nine subjects, on two occasions, using each method. In Experiment 2, thirty-five optometrists measured the IPD of one subject, on one occasion only, using the same three methods. The results of Experiment 1 showed that measurements of IPD differed depending on the method used, although the differences were small. The 95% limits of agreement were largest with Viktorin's method and least with the pupillometer. The results of Experiment 2 also revealed a small difference in IPD between the three methods of measurement. As in Experiment 1, the 95% limits of agreement were greatest with Viktorin's method and least with the pupillometer. Small differences in IPD were found between Viktorin's, corneal reflection and pupillometer methods of measurement. Not surprisingly, inter-examiner repeatability was slightly poorer than intra-examiner repeatability. However, the differences were small enough not to be clinically significant for the majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615442     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

1.  Influence of age on measured anatomical and physiological interpupillary distance (far and near), and near heterophoria, in Arab males.

Authors:  Saud A Alanazi; Mana A Alanazi; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16

2.  Nasopupillary asymmetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Arenas; Diana Muñoz; Evelyn Matheus; Diana Morales
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-04

3.  A Comparison of Spectacles Purchased Online and in UK Optometry Practice.

Authors:  Alison J Alderson; Alison Green; David Whitaker; Andrew J Scally; David B Elliott
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data of Interpupillary Distance and Pupil Diameter Using Eye-Tracking Technology.

Authors:  Nicholas P Murray; Melissa Hunfalvay; Takumi Bolte
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Evaluation of interpupillary distance in the Turkish population.

Authors:  Yildiray Yildirim; Ibrahim Sahbaz; Taner Kar; Gamze Kagan; Mehmet Tolga Taner; Ilker Armagan; Begum Cakici
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-03

6.  Agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic interpupillary distance measurements.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Einat Shneor; Ravid Doron
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-04-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.