J E Gunton1, G Hams, M Fiegert, A McElduff. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW. jennyeg@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess iodine status in four separate groups--pregnant women, postpartum women, patients with diabetes mellitus and volunteers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney. PARTICIPANTS: 81 pregnant women attending a "high risk" obstetric clinic; 26 of these same women who attended three months postpartum; 135 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus attending the diabetes clinic for an annual complications screen; and 19 volunteers. There were no exclusion criteria. METHODS: Spot urine samples were obtained, and urinary iodine was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Iodine status based on urinary iodine concentration categorised as normal (> 100 micrograms/L), mild deficiency (51-100 micrograms/L) and moderate to severe deficiency (< 50 micrograms/L). RESULTS: Moderate to severe iodine deficiency was found in 16 pregnant women (19.8%), five postpartum women (19.2%), 46 patients with diabetes (34.1%) and five volunteers (26.3%). Mild iodine deficiency was found in an additional 24 pregnant women (29.6%), nine postpartum women (34.6%), 51 patients with diabetes (37.8%) and 9 normal volunteers (47.4%). Median urinary iodine concentration was 104 micrograms/L in pregnant women, 79 micrograms/L in postpartum women, 65 micrograms/L in patients with diabetes mellitus and 64 micrograms/L in volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of iodine deficiency found in our participants suggests that dietary sources of iodine in this country may no longer be sufficient. Further population studies are required.
OBJECTIVE: To assess iodine status in four separate groups--pregnant women, postpartum women, patients with diabetes mellitus and volunteers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney. PARTICIPANTS: 81 pregnant women attending a "high risk" obstetric clinic; 26 of these same women who attended three months postpartum; 135 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus attending the diabetes clinic for an annual complications screen; and 19 volunteers. There were no exclusion criteria. METHODS: Spot urine samples were obtained, and urinary iodine was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Iodine status based on urinary iodine concentration categorised as normal (> 100 micrograms/L), mild deficiency (51-100 micrograms/L) and moderate to severe deficiency (< 50 micrograms/L). RESULTS: Moderate to severe iodine deficiency was found in 16 pregnant women (19.8%), five postpartum women (19.2%), 46 patients with diabetes (34.1%) and five volunteers (26.3%). Mild iodine deficiency was found in an additional 24 pregnant women (29.6%), nine postpartum women (34.6%), 51 patients with diabetes (37.8%) and 9 normal volunteers (47.4%). Median urinary iodine concentration was 104 micrograms/L in pregnant women, 79 micrograms/L in postpartum women, 65 micrograms/L in patients with diabetes mellitus and 64 micrograms/L in volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of iodine deficiency found in our participants suggests that dietary sources of iodine in this country may no longer be sufficient. Further population studies are required.
Authors: Vicki L Clifton; Nicolette A Hodyl; Paul A Fogarty; David J Torpy; Rachel Roberts; Ted Nettelbeck; Gary Ma; Basil Hetzel Journal: Nutr J Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.271