Literature DB >> 10613960

Varied effects of 1-octanol on gap junctional communication between ovarian epithelial cells and oocytes of Oncopeltus fasciatus, Hyalophora cecropia, and Drosophila melanogaster.

E L Adler1, R I Woodruff.   

Abstract

In insect gap junctions, species-specific differences occur in response to the purported gap junction uncoupling agent, 1-octanol. Changes in gap junctional communication between oocytes and their epithelial cells following treatment with 1-octanol were assayed in Oncopeltus fasciatus (the milkweed bug), Hyalophora cecropia (the American silk moth), and Drosophila melanogaster. In all three species, microinjection of untreated control follicles with Lucifer yellow CH revealed extensive dye coupling among epithelial cells and between epithelial cells and their oocytes. Also for all three species, treatment with octanol appeared to completely block dye coupling and increase oocyte input resistance. The effect on electrical coupling varied. In Drosophila, octanol diminished the electrical coupling from 64% (0.64 coupling coefficient) in controls to 53% in treated follicles. In Hyalophora, the coupling ratio remained the same following treatment. In Oncopeltus, octanol actually increased the electrical coupling ratio from 84% in controls to 94% in treated follicles. While 0.5 mM octanol left some Oncopeltus epithelial cells dye coupled to the oocyte, the electrical coupling ratio was increased slightly more by this concentration than by 1 or 5 mM octanol solutions, although the differences were not significant. While input resistance (R(o )) increased in all three following treatment with octanol, there was considerable difference in the magnitude of the response. Average oocyte R(o ) for Oncopeltus increased the least of the three species, rising from 196-240 kOhm. Both Hyalophora, with a nearly fourfold increase from 230-900 kOhm or more, and Drosophila, with a twofold increase from 701 kOhm to over 1.2 MegOhm showed much larger changes. Results shown here indicate that insect gap junctions have more varied responses to this common gap junction antagonist than have been reported for their vertebrate counterparts. Arch. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10613960     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(200001)43:1<22::AID-ARCH4>3.0.CO;2-U

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol        ISSN: 0739-4462            Impact factor:   1.698


  4 in total

1.  Role of gap junctions and mechanosensitive ion channels in the mechanisms of growth pulsations of Gonothyraea loveni.

Authors:  D A Nikishin; S V Kremnyov; N S Glagoleva
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-13

2.  Long-range neural and gap junction protein-mediated cues control polarity during planarian regeneration.

Authors:  Néstor J Oviedo; Junji Morokuma; Peter Walentek; Ido P Kema; Man Bock Gu; Joo-Myung Ahn; Jung Shan Hwang; Takashi Gojobori; Michael Levin
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Vitellogenesis in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster: antagonists demonstrate that the PLC, IP3/DAG, PK-C pathway is triggered by calmodulin.

Authors:  Bethany J Brubaker-Purkey; Richard I Woodruff
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Gap Junctional Blockade Stochastically Induces Different Species-Specific Head Anatomies in Genetically Wild-Type Girardia dorotocephala Flatworms.

Authors:  Maya Emmons-Bell; Fallon Durant; Jennifer Hammelman; Nicholas Bessonov; Vitaly Volpert; Junji Morokuma; Kaylinnette Pinet; Dany S Adams; Alexis Pietak; Daniel Lobo; Michael Levin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.