Literature DB >> 10612917

Implants and sinus-inlay bone grafts in a 1-stage procedure on severely atrophied maxillae: surgical aspects of a 3-year follow-up study.

B Johansson1, K Wannfors, J Ekenbäck, J I Smedberg, J Hirsch.   

Abstract

This 3-year follow-up study compares implant treatment in 39 1-stage sinus-inlay block-grafted patients (study group) with 37 patients treated without bone grafting (reference group), all of whom were edentulous in the maxilla and were treated over the same time period. The cumulative success rate (CSR) of implant stability after 3 years in the study group was 75.3% in grafted areas and 82.2% in non-grafted areas. The CSR after 3 years in the reference group was 93.1%. The mean marginal bone resorption after 3 years of loading was 1.4 mm in grafted areas and 1.6 mm in non-grafted areas in the study group and 1.1 mm in the reference group. Complications noted during the postoperative healing periods correlated significantly with implant failures later on (P < .05). Since prosthesis stability (CSR) after 3 years was 94.9% in the study group and 97.3% in the reference group, it can be concluded that 1-stage sinus-inlay block grafts can be regarded as a safe method with a predictable outcome for use on patients with severely atrophied edentulous maxillae, although increased failure rates are to be expected for implants placed in bone-grafted regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10612917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  9 in total

1.  8-10 year follow-up survival of dental implants in maxillae with or without autogenous bone graft reconstruction.

Authors:  Paulo H de Moraes; Sergio Olate; Andrezza Lauria; Luciana Asprino; Márcio de Moraes; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Pterygomaxillary implants: a graftless solution to deficient maxillary bone.

Authors:  G N Anandakrishna; Girish Rao
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-12

Review 3.  [Sinus floor elevation and augmentation. Evidence-based analysis of prognosis and risk factors].

Authors:  F P Strietzel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-02-06

4.  Assessment of maxillary sinus lifting procedure in the presence of chronic sinusitis, a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Abdullah Atef Hammuda; Mohamed Moawad Ghoneim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-08

5.  Repair of a perforated sinus membrane with a subepithelial palatal conjunctive flap: technique report and evaluation.

Authors:  S A Gehrke; S Taschieri; M Del Fabbro; S Corbella
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 6.  Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation without grafts - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rakshith Hegde; Krishna Prasad; Kaiwan Khurshed Shroff
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Flapless Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgery with Contextual Transcrestal Sinus Lift Augmentation Using New Bone Compactor Tools.

Authors:  Ferdinando Attanasio; Sergio Bortolini; Daniele Carbone; Andrea Pacifici
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Simultaneous and delayed direct sinus lift versus conventional implants: Retrospective study with 5-years minimum follow-up.

Authors:  J Romero-Millán; F Hernández-Alfaro; M Peñarrocha-Diago; D Soto-Peñaloza; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  Long-Term Comparison of Survival and Marginal Bone of Implants with and without Sinus Augmentation in Maxillary Molars within the Same Patients: A 5.8- to 22-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Won-Bae Park; Ji-Young Han; Kyung-Lhi Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.