Literature DB >> 10612827

UMD (Universal mutation database): a generic software to build and analyze locus-specific databases.

C Béroud1, G Collod-Béroud, C Boileau, T Soussi, C Junien.   

Abstract

The human genome is thought to contain about 80,000 genes and presently only 3,000 are known to be implicated in genetic diseases. In the near future, the entire sequence of the human genome will be available and the development of new methods for point mutation detection will lead to a huge increase in the identification of genes and their mutations associated with genetic diseases as well as cancers, which is growing in frequency in industrial states. The collection of these mutations will be critical for researchers and clinicians to establish genotype/phenotype correlations. Other fields such as molecular epidemiology will also be developed using these new data. Consequently, the future lies not in simple repositories of locus-specific mutations but in dynamic databases linked to various computerized tools for their analysis and that can be directly queried on-line. To meet this goal, we devised a generic software called UMD (Universal Mutation Database). It was developed as a generic software to create locus-specific databases (LSDBs) with the 4(th) Dimension(R) package from ACI. This software includes an optimized structure to assist and secure data entry and to allow the input of various clinical data. Thanks to the flexible structure of the UMD software, it has been successfully adapted to nine genes either involved in cancer (APC, P53, RB1, MEN1, SUR1, VHL, and WT1) or in genetic diseases (FBN1 and LDLR). Four new LSDBs are under construction (VLCAD, MCAD, KIR6, and COL4A5). Finally, the data can be transferred to core databases. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10612827     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<86::AID-HUMU16>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  53 in total

1.  Determining the identifiability of DNA database entries.

Authors:  B Malin; L Sweeney
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Human genotype-phenotype databases: aims, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Anthony J Brookes; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Recommendations for locus-specific databases and their curation.

Authors:  R G H Cotton; A D Auerbach; J S Beckmann; O O Blumenfeld; A J Brookes; A F Brown; P Carrera; D W Cox; B Gottlieb; M S Greenblatt; P Hilbert; H Lehvaslaiho; P Liang; S Marsh; D W Nebert; S Povey; S Rossetti; C R Scriver; M Summar; D R Tolan; I C Verma; M Vihinen; J T den Dunnen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Human Variome Project Quality Assessment Criteria for Variation Databases.

Authors:  Mauno Vihinen; John M Hancock; Donna R Maglott; Melissa J Landrum; Gerard C P Schaafsma; Peter Taschner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Using Somatic Mutations from Tumors to Classify Variants in Mismatch Repair Genes.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Eric Q Konnick; Sarah Upham; Tom Walsh; John Michael O Ranola; Angela L Jacobson; Mary-Claire King; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Von hippel-lindau disease.

Authors:  Frederik J Hes; Jo Wm Höppener; Rob B van der Luijt; Cornelis Jm Lips
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Hypoxia and cell cycle regulation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor.

Authors:  W Liu; H Xin; D T Eckert; J A Brown; J R Gnarra
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Clinical and functional properties of novel VHL mutation (X214L) consistent with Type 2A phenotype and low risk of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A D Sorrell; S Lee; C Stolle; J Ellenhorn; A Grix; W G Kaelin; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 9.  Human variation databases.

Authors:  Jan Küntzer; Daniela Eggle; Stefan Klostermann; Helmut Burtscher
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  COMUS: Clinician-Oriented locus-specific MUtation detection and deposition System.

Authors:  Sungwoong Jho; Byoung-Chul Kim; Ho Ghang; Ji-Han Kim; Daeui Park; Hak-Min Kim; Soo-young Jung; Ki-young Yoo; Hee-Jin Kim; Sunghoon Lee; Jong Bhak
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.