Literature DB >> 10612404

Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.

D G Kirschen1, C C Hung, T R Nakano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between visual acuity and stereoacuity has been well documented: as binocular visual acuity increases, stereoacuity improves. We compared interocular differences in visual acuity and stereoacuity in two presbyopic soft contact lens modalities, monovision and a new soft bifocal contact lens, the Acuvue Bifocal. The Acuvue Bifocal is hypothesized to show a smaller interocular acuity difference, increased stereoacuity, and decreased suppression over monovision at distance and near.
METHODS: Monovision patients wearing Acuvue or Surevue soft contact lenses were tested for visual acuity, stereoacuity, and suppression at distance and near. Stereoacuity was tested with the Randot Stereotest (near) and the BVAT (distance). Suppression was evaluated with the Acuity Suppression Vectogram (near) and the BVAT (distance). Patients were then fit with the Acuvue Bifocal in each eye. After wearing the lenses for 1 week, the same tests of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and suppression were performed.
RESULTS: The mean interocular acuity difference (IAD) at distance with monovision was 0.712 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (SD = 0.275) and 0.188 logMAR (SD = 0.252) (p < 0.001) with the Acuvue Bifocal. At near, the mean IAD with monovision was 0.420 logMAR (SD = 0.183) and 0.137 logMAR (SD = 0.147) (p < 0.001) with the Acuvue Bifocal. Of the monovision subjects, 89% (17 of 19) demonstrated suppression at near while only 26% (5 of 19) did with the bifocal lenses (statistically significant at p < 0.001). Stereoacuity at near improved from a median of 200 sec arc with monovision to 50 sec arc with the bifocal lenses.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, correcting presbyopia with the Acuvue Bifocal versus monovision resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the interocular difference in visual acuity at distance and near. The decreased interocular difference in visual acuity improved certain aspects of binocularity as demonstrated by a decrease in suppression and an increase in stereoacuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10612404     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199912000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Marika Berchicci; Shehzad A Naroo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake; James E McDonald
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Modified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performance.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Ramkumar Sabesan; Je-Sun Oh; Scott MacRae; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity.

Authors:  Yo Iwata; Fusako Fujimura; Tomoya Handa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Depth Perception with a Newly Developed Microscope Stereotest.

Authors:  Kayo Shinomiya; Takashi Fujikado; Akiko Kitora; Satoe Okamoto; Akiko Iwata; Yoko Ogushi; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 6.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Shehzad A Naroo; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.