Literature DB >> 10611717

Baseline blink rates and the effect of visual task difficulty and position of gaze.

P Cho1, C Sheng, C Chan, R Lee, J Tam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the baseline blink rates (BBR) measured under different (baseline) conditions, and to compare the blink rates measured when performing two visual tasks of different levels of difficulty at two positions of gaze.
METHODS: In the first single masked experiment, BBR were measured under three different conditions - (i) conversation with the subjects (ii) taking the visual acuity and (iii) keeping the subjects waiting in an empty examination room. In the second single masked experiment, the subjects were required to perform an easy task (reading normal English words) and a difficult task (reading mirror-image English words) at primary gaze and down gaze. The orders of the tasks performed were randomly allocated.
RESULTS: BBR taken under the three different conditions were significantly different from each other. No significant difference was found between the blink rates measured when performing the two reading tasks if they were performed at the same position of gaze. The mean blink rates were significantly lower when performing the tasks at down gaze than when performing the tasks at primary gaze. No significant differences were found between BBR-waiting and blink rate measured when the subject was doing the easy task at primary gaze, and between BBR-VA and blink rate measured when the subject was performing the difficult task at primary gaze.
CONCLUSIONS: BBR measured under different (baseline) conditions produced different results so it is important for investigators to describe the baseline condition very clearly in studies where BBR are measured. Our results also indicated that mean blink rate was affected by the position of gaze and not the level of task difficulty.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10611717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  7 in total

1.  Blinking and operating: cognition versus vision.

Authors:  K K W Wong; W Y Wan; S B Kaye
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency.

Authors:  P Wolkoff; J K Nøjgaard; P Troiano; B Piccoli
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Eye blink frequency during different computer tasks quantified by electrooculography.

Authors:  J H Skotte; J K Nøjgaard; L V Jørgensen; K B Christensen; G Sjøgaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Smartphone gaming induces dry eye symptoms and reduces blinking in school-aged children.

Authors:  Ngozi Charity Chidi-Egboka; Isabelle Jalbert; Blanka Golebiowski
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Indoor pollutant exposure among children with and without asthma in Porto, Portugal, during the cold season.

Authors:  Joana Madureira; Inês Paciência; João Cavaleiro-Rufo; Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Effect of distance vision and refractive error on the spontaneous eye blink activity in human subjects in primary eye gaze.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Overground Walking Decreases Alpha Activity and Entrains Eye Movements in Humans.

Authors:  Liyu Cao; Xinyu Chen; Barbara F Haendel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.