Literature DB >> 10611199

Bone mineral density during long-term use of the progestagen contraceptive implant Implanon compared to a non-hormonal method of contraception.

R Beerthuizen1, A van Beek, R Massai, L Mäkäräinen, J Hout, H C Bennink.   

Abstract

An open, prospective, comparative study was done in healthy women, aged between 18 and 40 years, to study the effects of long-term etonogestrel treatment on bone mineral density (BMD). The control group used a non-hormone-medicated intrauterine device (IUD). The BMD was measured using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry instrument. Measurements included the lumbar spine (L(2)-L(4)), the proximal femur (femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter) and distal radius. The period of treatment was 2 years and 44 women in the Implanon group and 29 in the IUD group provided data. Groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age, weight, body mass index, BMD and 17beta-oestradiol status. Changes from baseline in BMD in the Implanon group were not essentially different from those in the IUD group. There was no relationship between 17beta-oestradiol concentrations and changes in BMD in this study population. The results of the present study indicate that Implanon((R)) can safely be used in young women who have not yet achieved their peak bone mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10611199     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  The sexual health of adolescents with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Stephen Roberts; Pippa Green
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Factors associated with bone mineral density in healthy African women.

Authors:  Nyaradzo M Mgodi; Cliff Kelly; Brenda Gati; Susan Greenspan; James Y Dai; Vivian Bragg; Edward Livant; Jeanna M Piper; Clemensia Nakabiito; Tsitsi Magure; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Z Mike Chirenje; Sharon A Riddler
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Update on hormonal contraception and bone density.

Authors:  Michelle M Isley; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Etonogestrel implant effectiveness.

Authors:  Nicolas Dugré; Nidhi Choksi; Jessica Kirkwood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.025

Review 5.  Contraception for HIV-Infected Adolescents.

Authors:  Athena P Kourtis; Ayesha Mirza
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Contraception for adolescents with lupus.

Authors:  Melissa S Tesher; Amy Whitaker; Melissa Gilliam; Linda Wagner-Weiner; Karen B Onel
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.054

7.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.

Authors:  Heather Hohmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  A three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Cecilia Monteiro-Dantas; Ximena Espejo-Arce; Jeffrey F Lui-Filho; Arlete M Fernandes; Ilza Monteiro; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 9.  Bone health in estrogen-free contraception.

Authors:  P Hadji; E Colli; P-A Regidor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.