Literature DB >> 1061091

Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution.

A C Wilson, G L Bush, S M Case, M C King.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the evolution of organisms is dependent to a large degree on gene rearrangement, we devised a way of estimating rates of evolutionary change in karyotype. This non-biochemical method is based on consideration of chromosomal variability within taxonomic groups having a fossil record. The results show that chromosomal evolution has been faster in placental mammals than in other vertebrates or molluscs. This finding is consistent with published evidence that placentals have also been evolving unusually fast in anatomy and way of life. However, the structural genes of placentals seem not to have experienced accelerated evolution. Possibly, therefore, anatomical evolution may be facilitated by gene rearrangement. To explain how placentals achieved this rate of chromosomal evolution, we consider the process by which a new gene arrangement becomes fixed and spreads. The structure and dynamics of placental populations may be especially favorable for this process. The key factor involved seems to be the type of social behavior which produces small effective population sizes and inbreeding. As Bush points out elsewhere, such social structuring of populations may promote rapid fixation of gene rearrangements and rapid speciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1061091      PMCID: PMC388875          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal proteins and chromatin structure.

Authors:  S C Elgin; H Weintraub
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  M C King; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A theory of evolution above the species level.

Authors:  S M Stanley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; L C Dunn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Two modes of evolution.

Authors:  L Van Valen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution.

Authors:  A C Wilson; V M Sarich; L R Maxson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Behavior and genetic variation in natural populations.

Authors:  R K Selander
Journal:  Am Zool       Date:  1970-02

8.  Two types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridization.

Authors:  A C Wilson; L R Maxson; V M Sarich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Convergent morphological evolution detected by studying proteins of tree frogs in the Hyla eximia species group.

Authors:  L R Maxson; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  29 in total

1.  Stable methylation patterns in interspecific antelope hybrids and the characterization and localization of a satellite fraction in the Alcelaphini and Hippotragini.

Authors:  T J Robinson; O Wittekindt; J J Pasantes; W S Modi; W Schempp; D J Morris-Rosendahl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Rapid, independent, and extensive amplification of telomeric repeats in pericentromeric regions in karyotypes of arvicoline rodents.

Authors:  M Th Rovatsos; J A Marchal; I Romero-Fernández; F J Fernández; E B Giagia-Athanosopoulou; Antonio Sánchez
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Satellite DNA and cytogenetic evolution. DNA quantity, satellite DNA and karyotypic variations in kangaroo rats (genus Dipodomys).

Authors:  F T Hatch; A J Bodner; J A Mazrimas; D H Moore
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time.

Authors:  D A Levin; A C Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  SPECIATION IN MAMMALS AND THE GENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT.

Authors:  Robert J Baker; Robert D Bradley
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  What history tells us XXIII. The genetic distance between humans and chimpanzees: what did Mary-Claire King and Allan Wilson really say in 1975?

Authors:  Michel Morange
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  On some genetic consequences of social structure, mating systems, dispersal, and sampling.

Authors:  Bárbara R Parreira; Lounès Chikhi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  2020 William Allan Award address: genetics as a way of thinking-cultural inheritance from our teachers.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Comparative mapping using somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  J D Minna; P A Lalley; U Francke
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1976-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.