Literature DB >> 10610758

Suppression analysis of positive control mutants of NifA reveals two overlapping promoters for Klebsiella pneumoniae rpoN.

R A Grande1, B Valderrama, E Morett.   

Abstract

Activation of gene expression relies on direct molecular interactions between the RNA polymerase and transcription factors. Eubacterial enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs) activate transcription by binding to distant sites and, simultaneously, contacting the sigma(54)-holoenzyme form of the RNA polymerase (Esigma(54)). The interaction between the EBP and Esigma(54) is transient, such that it has been difficult to be studied biochemically. Therefore, the details of this molecular recognition event are not known. Genetic and physical evidences suggest that the highly conserved C3 region in the activation domain of the EBP has major determinants for positive control and for the interaction with Esigma(54). To further investigate the target of this region we searched for extragenic suppressors of some C3 region mutant derivatives of NifA. As a first step we mutagenized Klebsiella pneumoniae rpoN, the gene that codes for sigma(54). A mutant allele, rpoN1320, that suppressed two different NifA derivatives was obtained. Immunodetection of sigma(54) and transcriptional initiation studies demonstrated that the cause of the suppression was an enhanced expression of rpoN. A single point mutation was responsible for the phenotype. It mapped at the -10 region of an unidentified promoter, here denominated rpoNp1, and increased its similarity to the consensus. A second upstream promoter, denominated rpoNp2, was also identified. Its -10 region partially overlaps with the -35 region of rpoNp1. Interestingly, the promoter-up -10 mutation in rpoNp1 caused a reduction in the expression from rpoNp2, likely reflecting a stronger occupancy of the former promoter by the RNA polymerase at the expense of the latter. The presence of two overlapping promoters competing for the RNA polymerase implies a complex regulatory pattern that needs elucidation. The fact that increasing the concentration of sigma(54) in the cell can suppress positive control mutants of NifA adds further evidence for their direct interaction in the activation process. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10610758     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  4 in total

Review 1.  The bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma(54) (sigma(N)) transcription factor.

Authors:  M Buck; M T Gallegos; D J Studholme; Y Guo; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Identification of the Geobacter metallireducens bamVW two-component system, involved in transcriptional regulation of aromatic degradation.

Authors:  Javier F Juárez; María Teresa Zamarro; María J L Barragán; Blas Blázquez; Matthias Boll; Kevin Kuntze; José Luis García; Eduardo Díaz; Manuel Carmona
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Binding of transcriptional activators to sigma 54 in the presence of the transition state analog ADP-aluminum fluoride: insights into activator mechanochemical action.

Authors:  M Chaney; R Grande; S R Wigneshweraraj; W Cannon; P Casaz; M T Gallegos; J Schumacher; S Jones; S Elderkin; A E Dago; E Morett; M Buck
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Comparative analysis of regulatory elements between Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae by genome-wide transcription start site profiling.

Authors:  Donghyuk Kim; Jay Sung-Joong Hong; Yu Qiu; Harish Nagarajan; Joo-Hyun Seo; Byung-Kwan Cho; Shih-Feng Tsai; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.