Literature DB >> 10610712

A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps.

F Yang1, P C O'Brien, B S Milne, A S Graphodatsky, N Solanky, V Trifonov, W Rens, D Sargan, M A Ferguson-Smith.   

Abstract

Cross-species reciprocal chromosome painting was used to delineate homologous chromosomal segments between domestic dog, red fox, and human. Whole sets of chromosome-specific painting probes for the red fox and dog were made by PCR amplification of flow-sorted chromosomes from established cell cultures. Based on their hybridization patterns, a complete comparative chromosome map of the three species has been built. Thirty-nine of the 44 synteny groups from the published radiation hybrid map and 33 of the 40 linkage groups in the linkage map of the dog have been assigned to specific chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR-based genotyping. Each canine chromosome has at least one DNA marker assigned to it. The human-canid map shows that the canid karyotypes are among the most extensively rearranged karyotypes in mammals. Twenty-two human autosomal paints delineated 73 homologous regions on 38 canine autosomes, while paints from 38 dog autosomes detected 90 homologous segments in the human genome. Of the 22 human autosomes, only the syntenies of three chromosomes (14, 20, and 21) have been maintained intact in the canid genome. The dog-fox map and DAPI banding comparison demonstrate that the remarkable karyotype differences between fox (2n = 34 + 0-8 Bs) and dog (2n = 78) are due to 26 chromosomal fusion events and 4 fission events. It is proposed that the more easily karyotyped fox chromosomes can be used as a common reference and control system for future gene mapping in the DogMap project and CGH analysis of canine tumor DNA. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10610712     DOI: 10.1006/geno.1999.5989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  111 in total

1.  A comparative chromosome map of the Arctic fox, red fox and dog defined by chromosome painting and high resolution G-banding.

Authors:  A S Graphodatsky; F Yang; P C O'Brien; N Serdukova; B S Milne; V Trifonov; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep.

Authors:  Filomena Adega; Raquel Chaves; Andrea Kofler; Paul R Krausman; Julio Masabanda; Johannes Wienberg; Henrique Guedes-Pinto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Genetics of behavior in the silver fox.

Authors:  Anna V Kukekova; Svetlana V Temnykh; Jennifer L Johnson; Lyudmila N Trut; Gregory M Acland
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Cross-species chromosome painting among camel, cattle, pig and human: further insights into the putative Cetartiodactyla ancestral karyotype.

Authors:  Gabriel Balmus; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Patricia C M O'Brien; Elena S Alkalaeva; Beiyuan Fu; Julian A Skidmore; Twink Allen; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosome localization of microsatellite markers in the shrews of the Sorex araneus group.

Authors:  Patrick Basset; Glenn Yannic; Fengtang Yang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Gabriel Balmus; Vitaly T Volobouev; Jacques Hausser
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Comparative genome maps of the pangolin, hedgehog, sloth, anteater and human revealed by cross-species chromosome painting: further insight into the ancestral karyotype and genome evolution of eutherian mammals.

Authors:  Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Tangliang Li; Beiyuan Fu; Gauthier Dobigny; Jinghuan Wang; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Serdukova; Weiting Su; Patricia Cm O'Brien; Yingxiang Wang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Vitaly Volobouev; Wenhui Nie
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Foreword. Comparative cytogenetics in the genomics era: cytogenomics comes of age.

Authors:  Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Microdissection and chromosome painting of X and B chromosomes in Locusta migratoria.

Authors:  María Teruel; Josefa Cabrero; Eugenia E Montiel; Manuel J Acosta; Antonio Sánchez; Juan Pedro M Camacho
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Cytogenetic analysis of Anopheles ovengensis revealed high structural divergence of chromosomes in the Anopheles nili group.

Authors:  Maria V Sharakhova; Ashley Peery; Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio; Ai Xia; Cyrille Ndo; Parfait Awono-Ambene; Frederic Simard; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Genome-wide comparative chromosome maps of Arvicola amphibius, Dicrostonyx torquatus, and Myodes rutilus.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Natalya A Lemskaya; Vladimir A Trifonov; Natalya A Serdyukova; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.