BACKGROUND: Regular exercise increases exercise capacity and physical fitness, but questions remain about the effects of exercise on left ventricle (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction. This study investigated the effects of moderate to high intensity exercise training on LV remodeling after a first myocardial infarction. METHODS: An exercise group of 68 patients in cardiac rehabilitation after a first myocardial infarction had an initial echocardiogram and exercise stress test. Thirty patients completed the 12 weeks of training and had echocardiograms suitable for quantitative analysis. Follow-up echocardiograms and exercise tests were performed. A carefully matched control group of 30 patients with echocardiograms at fixed intervals after myocardial infarction and no formal exercise training were also studied. LV size was expressed as the endocardial surface area-to-body surface area (ESAi), whereas infarct size was characterized by the percent abnormal wall motion (%AWM) by echocardiography using an endocardial surface area mapping technique. Indices of LV shape (sphericity) were also assessed. RESULTS: In the exercise group, no significant changes were seen in ESAi (57.95 +/- 13.1 vs 57.80 +/- 12.04 cm2/m2) or in %AWM (19.33 +/- 15.27 vs 20.11 +/- 15.95) from the initial to the final echo. The indices of sphericity were also unchanged. None of these parameters changed in the control group. Within each group was found heterogeneity in LV remodeling. Multivariate regression analysis revealed initial ESAi and initial %AWM to predict change in ESAi over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with predominately small infarcts, exercise training did not adversely affect LV remodeling after myocardial infarction. Remodeling is heterogeneous and appears related to infarct and LV size.
BACKGROUND: Regular exercise increases exercise capacity and physical fitness, but questions remain about the effects of exercise on left ventricle (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction. This study investigated the effects of moderate to high intensity exercise training on LV remodeling after a first myocardial infarction. METHODS: An exercise group of 68 patients in cardiac rehabilitation after a first myocardial infarction had an initial echocardiogram and exercise stress test. Thirty patients completed the 12 weeks of training and had echocardiograms suitable for quantitative analysis. Follow-up echocardiograms and exercise tests were performed. A carefully matched control group of 30 patients with echocardiograms at fixed intervals after myocardial infarction and no formal exercise training were also studied. LV size was expressed as the endocardial surface area-to-body surface area (ESAi), whereas infarct size was characterized by the percent abnormal wall motion (%AWM) by echocardiography using an endocardial surface area mapping technique. Indices of LV shape (sphericity) were also assessed. RESULTS: In the exercise group, no significant changes were seen in ESAi (57.95 +/- 13.1 vs 57.80 +/- 12.04 cm2/m2) or in %AWM (19.33 +/- 15.27 vs 20.11 +/- 15.95) from the initial to the final echo. The indices of sphericity were also unchanged. None of these parameters changed in the control group. Within each group was found heterogeneity in LV remodeling. Multivariate regression analysis revealed initial ESAi and initial %AWM to predict change in ESAi over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with predominately small infarcts, exercise training did not adversely affect LV remodeling after myocardial infarction. Remodeling is heterogeneous and appears related to infarct and LV size.