OBJECTIVE: This article describes results from a study investigating the effects of using long assessment instruments on attrition rates in mailed-out surveys. METHOD: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of two versions of a mailed-out survey; one version incorporated a detailed assessment of drinking using the Timeline Follow back method (TLFB; n = 46) and the other employed a brief graduated frequency measure of alcohol consumption (n = 49). RESULTS: 29% fewer respondents who received the TLFB returned any of their survey materials as compared to those respondents who received just the graduated frequency measure (22% vs 51%). CONCLUSIONS: In some situations, e.g., mailed-out surveys, employing detailed survey instruments may not be justified as the increased respondent burden may result in increased attrition rates.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This article describes results from a study investigating the effects of using long assessment instruments on attrition rates in mailed-out surveys. METHOD:Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of two versions of a mailed-out survey; one version incorporated a detailed assessment of drinking using the Timeline Follow back method (TLFB; n = 46) and the other employed a brief graduated frequency measure of alcohol consumption (n = 49). RESULTS: 29% fewer respondents who received the TLFB returned any of their survey materials as compared to those respondents who received just the graduated frequency measure (22% vs 51%). CONCLUSIONS: In some situations, e.g., mailed-out surveys, employing detailed survey instruments may not be justified as the increased respondent burden may result in increased attrition rates.
Authors: Jim McCambridge; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Ian R White; Zarnie Khadjesari; Elizabeth Murray; Stuart Linke; Simon G Thompson; Christine Godfrey; Paul Wallace Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Alex H Krist; Teresa Day; John Cyrus; Steven H Woolf Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Robert A Perera; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Alex H Krist Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Laura Ballester; Itxaso Alayo; Gemma Vilagut; José Almenara; Ana Isabel Cebrià; Enrique Echeburúa; Andrea Gabilondo; Margalida Gili; Carolina Lagares; José A Piqueras; Miquel Roca; Victoria Soto-Sanz; Maria Jesús Blasco; Pere Castellví; Carlos G Forero; Philippe Mortier; Jordi Alonso Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nicolas Bertholet; Elodie Schmutz; Véronique S Grazioli; Mohamed Faouzi; Jennifer McNeely; Gerhard Gmel; Jean-Bernard Daeppen; John A Cunningham Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 2.279