OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional benefit of synacthen depot over standard inpatient care for patients hospitalized with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS:All patients admitted to our unit with active RA without exclusion criteria were invited to participate and randomized to subcutaneous synacthen depot 0.5 mg on alternate days for 2 injections or 2 injections of saline. Patients, staff, and assessors of response were blinded to the intervention. Assessment [OMERACT set, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) global improvement, dose of intraarticular (IA) or intramuscular (IM) methylprednisolone] was performed at admission to hospital, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months. Oral prednisone use constituted a protocol violation. RESULTS: Of 137 patients with RA admitted over the period of recruitment, 36 (26%) were enrolled; 31 completed followup. There were no between-group differences in the change from admission of any individual disease activity measure at any time point. However, using a rigorous global response measure (ACR 50%), a difference was detected in favor of synacthen depot at discharge (52.6% of the intervention group improved vs. 17.6% of controls; p = 0.029, number-needed-to-treat 2.86). Patients treated with synacthen depot showed a trend toward more IA or IM corticosteroid between discharge and 3 months (mean dose 56 vs. 31 mg; p = 0.19) and a trend toward more patients requiring a change in slow acting antirheumatic drug after discharge (4 vs. 1; p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: There is some additional benefit of synacthen depot in the hospital treatment of RA, but the effect is lost by 3 months, with a suggestion of rebound worsening in these patients. We postulate that oversuppression of corticotrophin releasing hormone by exogenous adrenocorticotrophic hormone in patients who already have a hypothalamic deficit may contribute to the rebound worsening of disease activity seen in these patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional benefit of synacthen depot over standard inpatient care for patients hospitalized with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients admitted to our unit with active RA without exclusion criteria were invited to participate and randomized to subcutaneous synacthen depot 0.5 mg on alternate days for 2 injections or 2 injections of saline. Patients, staff, and assessors of response were blinded to the intervention. Assessment [OMERACT set, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) global improvement, dose of intraarticular (IA) or intramuscular (IM) methylprednisolone] was performed at admission to hospital, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months. Oral prednisone use constituted a protocol violation. RESULTS: Of 137 patients with RA admitted over the period of recruitment, 36 (26%) were enrolled; 31 completed followup. There were no between-group differences in the change from admission of any individual disease activity measure at any time point. However, using a rigorous global response measure (ACR 50%), a difference was detected in favor of synacthen depot at discharge (52.6% of the intervention group improved vs. 17.6% of controls; p = 0.029, number-needed-to-treat 2.86). Patients treated with synacthen depot showed a trend toward more IA or IM corticosteroid between discharge and 3 months (mean dose 56 vs. 31 mg; p = 0.19) and a trend toward more patients requiring a change in slow acting antirheumatic drug after discharge (4 vs. 1; p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: There is some additional benefit of synacthen depot in the hospital treatment of RA, but the effect is lost by 3 months, with a suggestion of rebound worsening in these patients. We postulate that oversuppression of corticotrophin releasing hormone by exogenous adrenocorticotrophic hormone in patients who already have a hypothalamic deficit may contribute to the rebound worsening of disease activity seen in these patients.
Authors: N S Sieber-Ruckstuhl; W A Burkhardt; N Hofer-Inteeworn; B Riond; I T Rast; R Hofmann-Lehmann; C E Reusch; F S Boretti Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Daniel F McWilliams; Divya Thankaraj; Julie Jones-Diette; Rheinallt Morgan; Onosi S Ifesemen; Nicholas G Shenker; David A Walsh Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 7.580