Literature DB >> 10605659

Evidence-based medicine and cost-effectiveness.

G C Brown1, S Sharma, M M Brown, S Garrett.   

Abstract

Most available medical management techniques compare the practice patterns of providers with other providers but overlook the inherent value of interventional medical therapies to patients and society. The authors present a methodology for objectively evaluating the quality and cost-effectiveness of medical interventional therapies, and comparing them to each other using the common denominator of cost per quality-adjusted life-year ($/QALY). Advantages of this methodology include the fact that it: (1) compares the cost-effectiveness of different treatment regimens, (2) incorporates patient preferences, (3) employs evidenced-based medical data, information that is most reliable and reproducible, (4) factors in the effect of treatment on the quality of life and length of life, (5) offers an evaluation of the clinical efficacy of a treatment, (6) identifies both superior and marginal treatments, (7) maximizes the effective use of scarce resources, and (8) simplifies the understanding of health care procedures for consumers, payers, and providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10605659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Finance        ISSN: 1078-6767


  8 in total

1.  The reproducibility of ophthalmic utility values.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; G Beauchamp; H Hollands
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

2.  Quality of life and systemic comorbidities in patients with ophthalmic disease.

Authors:  Melissa M Brown; Gary C Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Hussein Hollands; Jennifer Landy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Patient perceptions of quality-of-life associated with bilateral visual loss.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; H C Brown
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Quality of life with macular degeneration: perceptions of patients, clinicians, and community members.

Authors:  J D Stein; M M Brown; G C Brown; H Hollands; S Sharma
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization--The Submacular Surgery Trials Vision Preference Value Scale: SST Report No. 6.

Authors:  Eric B Bass; Marsha J Marsh; Carol M Mangione; Neil M Bressler; Ashley L Childs; Li Ming Dong; Barbara S Hawkins; Harris A Jaffee; Päivi Miskala
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12

6.  Utility values associated with blindness in an adult population.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; J Kistler; H Brown
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  The value of vision.

Authors:  Christine Knauer; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The quality of life of patients with hypertension.

Authors:  J D Stein; G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; H Hollands; H D Stein
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.