OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of the Visual Function Index (VF-14) in patients with retinal disease. DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire package in association with clinical examination findings. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients attending the Vancouver General Hospital Eye Care Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, retina clinic between May 1 and August 15, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to the questionnaire package as they relate to global self-assessment scales and visual acuity. In addition, correlations were calculated between the VF-14, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, a Weighted Comorbidity Scale, and visual acuity scores. RESULT: Five hundred forty-seven patients were given the questionnaire package to complete. The VF-14 demonstrated a moderately strong positive association with patient self-rating of amount of trouble, satisfaction, and overall quality of vision. Correlations between the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, visual acuity, and the global scales were mild to moderate. The VF-14 was moderately correlated with visual acuity in the better and the worse eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the validity of the VF-14 as a measure of functional impairment in patients with retinal disease. Once responsiveness has been measured and an analysis of disease subtypes has been carried out, the VF-14 will be ready for inclusion in clinical trials to evaluate patients' functional ability. Further implementation and development of this outcome measure will better our understanding of the utility of the functional assessment format for patients with retinal disease.
OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of the Visual Function Index (VF-14) in patients with retinal disease. DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire package in association with clinical examination findings. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients attending the Vancouver General Hospital Eye Care Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, retina clinic between May 1 and August 15, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to the questionnaire package as they relate to global self-assessment scales and visual acuity. In addition, correlations were calculated between the VF-14, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, a Weighted Comorbidity Scale, and visual acuity scores. RESULT: Five hundred forty-seven patients were given the questionnaire package to complete. The VF-14 demonstrated a moderately strong positive association with patient self-rating of amount of trouble, satisfaction, and overall quality of vision. Correlations between the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, visual acuity, and the global scales were mild to moderate. The VF-14 was moderately correlated with visual acuity in the better and the worse eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the validity of the VF-14 as a measure of functional impairment in patients with retinal disease. Once responsiveness has been measured and an analysis of disease subtypes has been carried out, the VF-14 will be ready for inclusion in clinical trials to evaluate patients' functional ability. Further implementation and development of this outcome measure will better our understanding of the utility of the functional assessment format for patients with retinal disease.
Authors: Christoph Hirneiss; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Carolin A Gass; Ingrid W Reiniger; Siegfried G Priglinger; Anselm Kampik; Christos Haritoglou Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Alex W Hewitt; V Swetha Jeganathan; Juanita E Kidd; Konrad Pesudovs; Nitin Verma Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2006-01-13 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Ron D Hays; Joanne Wu; Farzana Choudhury; Stanley P Azen Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2002 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Sylvia H Paz; Jerry Slotkin; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Paul Lee; Cynthia Owsley; Susan Vitale; Rohit Varma; Richard Gershon; Ron D Hays Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 4.147