Literature DB >> 10603520

Direct Comparison of Aspirin Plus Hirudin, Aspirin Plus Heparin, and Aspirin Alone Among 12,000 Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Not Receiving Thrombolysis: Rationale and Design of the First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1).

.   

Abstract

While antithrombotic therapy of acute myocardial infarction is clearly beneficial, substantial controversy exists regarding the optimal regimen. In particular, while aspirin alone has proven highly effective in reducing rates of reinfarction, stroke, and death following acute coronary occlusion, heparin has not clearly been shown to have additional benefit when added to aspirin but is associated with increased rates of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. At the same time, available data for newer specific thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin suggest greater benefits than aspirin alone or aspirin plus heparin in terms of maintaining coronary flow, but possibly higher risks of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. Since no completed or ongoing large-scale clinical trial has directly compared aspirin plus hirudin, aspirin plus heparin, and aspirin alone, it is not currently possible to decide which of these three antithrombotic regimens provides the optimal bmefit-to-risk ratio. The First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1) is directly comparing aspirin alone, aspirin plus heparin, and aspirin plus hirudin among 12,000 patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction who are not felt by their responsible physicians to be appropriate candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Such patients comprise almost two thirds of all U.S. subjects presenting with acute myocardial infarction and are a group at substantial risk of death, reinfarction, and stroke. Thus, the ASIS-I trial will provide importantly relevant data regarding the optimal antithrombotic regimen for the majority of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. In this manuscript we provide the rationale and design for the First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial directly comparing aspirin alone, aspirin plus intravenous heparin, and aspirin plus intravenous hirudin in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients not receiving thrombolytic therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 10603520     DOI: 10.1007/BF01062568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  31 in total

1.  Hirudin and other thrombin inhibitors experimental results and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  L Badimon; A Merino; J Badimon; J H Chesebro; V Fuster
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.677

2.  Maintenance of patency after thrombolysis in stenotic coronary arteries requires combined inhibition of thrombin and platelets.

Authors:  N A Prager; S R Torr-Brown; B E Sobel; D R Abendschein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Large-scale trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: GISSI-2, ISIS-3, and GUSTO-1.

Authors:  P M Ridker; C O'Donnell; V J Marder; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Trends in the use of drug therapies in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1988 to 1992.

Authors:  C L Pashos; S L Normand; J B Garfinkle; J P Newhouse; A M Epstein; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  D W Muller; E J Topol
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a "standard care" nomogram. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R A Raschke; B M Reilly; J R Guidry; J R Fontana; S Srinivas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Randomized trial of intravenous heparin versus recombinant hirudin for acute coronary syndromes. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) IIa Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Recombinant hirudin for unstable angina pectoris. A multicenter, randomized angiographic trial.

Authors:  E J Topol; V Fuster; R A Harrington; R M Califf; N S Kleiman; D J Kereiakes; M Cohen; A Chapekis; H K Gold; M A Tannenbaum
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. The RISC Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates.

Authors:  T H Lee; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; G W Rouan; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, are not influenced by acetylsalicylic acid.

Authors:  Gunnar Fager; Marie Cullberg; Maria Eriksson-Lepkowska; Lars Frison; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 2.953

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.