Literature DB >> 10598911

The intra-articular distance within the TMJ during free and loaded closing movements.

J J Huddleston Slater1, C M Visscher, F Lobbezoo, M Naeije.   

Abstract

Previous studies on free opening and closing movements of the mandible have demonstrated that the opening movement traces of the condylar kinematic center (i.e., the condylar point for which the protrusive and the opening movement traces coincide) lie closer to the articular eminence than the closing traces. This indicates the presence of an intra-articular distance within the joint during free closing. Since the mandible behaves like a class III biomechanical lever, a counteracting mechanical load on the mandible during closing will press the condyle-disc complex against the articular eminence. Therefore, in this study the hypothesis was tested that the difference between opening and closing movement traces of the kinematic center is reduced when the closing movements are counteracted by a mechanical load. From 10 healthy participants, 20-second movement recordings were obtained by a six-degrees-of-freedom opto-electronic jaw movement recording system (OKAS-3D) for three types of movements: (1) free opening and closing movements, (2) free opening and loaded closing movements (i.e., the participants closed against a small or high manually applied downward-directed force to the chin), and (3) gum chewing. Off-line, the opening and closing movement traces of the kinematic center were reconstructed, and the average difference between the traces (the intra-articular distance) was calculated. The average intraarticular distance was significantly smaller during loaded closing than during free closing, whereas no significant differences were found in the intra-articular distances between the loaded situations of low and high manual loading and contralateral chewing (ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons of means test, p<0.005). In conclusion, loading of the mandible during closing movements reduces the intra-articular distance within the temporomandibular joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598911     DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780120801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic MRI of the TMJ under physical load.

Authors:  A J Hopfgartner; O Tymofiyeva; P Ehses; K Rottner; J Boldt; E-J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The Effect of Altered Loading on Mandibular Condylar Cartilage.

Authors:  Raman Kaul; Mara H O'Brien; Eliane Dutra; Alexandro Lima; Achint Utreja; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The reciprocal jaw-muscle reflexes elicited by anterior- and back-tooth-contacts-a perspective to explain the control of the masticatory muscles.

Authors:  Lauri Vaahtoniemi
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 4.  Efficacy of Kinematic Parameters for Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Function and Disfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Scolaro; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Pooja Mali Rai; Francesca Falsarone; Francesca Alicchio; Arianna Mosca; Christian Greco; Massimo Del Fabbro; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

5.  Differences between the temporal and mandibular components of the temporomandibular joint in topographic distribution of osseous degenerative features on cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Chih-Mong Tsai; Jyh-Wen Chai; Fang-Yu Wu; Mu-Hsiung Chen; Chih-Ting Kao
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.080

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.