Literature DB >> 10598698

Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis and early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

G B Anderson1, D E Steinke, K C Petruk, R Ashforth, J M Findlay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a rapid and minimally invasive method of detecting intracranial aneurysms. We wished to determine whether CTA could replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis and operative planning of ruptured cerebral aneurysms.
METHODS: In a prospective study, patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosed by plain computed tomography underwent CTA, DSA, or both. Computed tomographic scans and CTA studies were first reviewed by the treating surgeon, along with a neuroradiologist, and a decision to proceed to DSA or directly to surgery was made on the basis of the type and quality of information provided by CTA. All patients underwent postoperative DSA.
RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were studied. In 24 patients, both CTA and DSA were negative for a source of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Twelve patients underwent DSA without prior CTA because a technologist capable of performing CTA was not available when the patient was evaluated. Nine patients in poor neurological condition underwent CTA, and all tested positive for aneurysms but died without surgical intervention. Of the 126 patients who underwent CTA and surgery, 65 (52%) also required preoperative DSA. The decision to proceed to DSA after CTA was influenced by aneurysm location; posterior communicating artery (62%) and posterior circulation locations (67-75%) more commonly proceeded to DSA than middle cerebral artery aneurysms (34%; 0.025 > P > 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of CTA for the detection of all aneurysms, ruptured and unruptured, in the group of patients who underwent both types of angiograms preoperatively were 84 and 100%, respectively. In the group of 61 patients in whom aneurysm surgery was performed on the basis of CTA results alone, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of all aneurysms, as compared with postoperative DSA, were 90 and 100%, respectively. Missed aneurysms (n = 24) were always small (<4 mm) and were usually found in patients with multiple aneurysms in whom the larger, ruptured aneurysm was identified by CTA. In one patient, the aneurysm missed by preoperative CTA would have resulted in a different operation if detected preoperatively.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to proceed to ruptured aneurysm repair entirely on the basis of good-quality CTA studies that demonstrate an aneurysm consistent with the pattern of bleeding observed on plain computed tomography (48% of the patients in this series and most common middle cerebral artery aneurysms). However, detection of small unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple lesions remains a problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598698     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199912000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  37 in total

1.  Accuracy of CT angiography in detection of blood supply dominance of posterior cerebral artery in patients with posterior communicating artery aneurysm.

Authors:  Osama Ahmed; Piyush Kalakoti; Richard Menger; Benjamin Brown; Shihao Zhang; Bharat Guthikonda; Hugo Cuellar
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-10-29

Review 2.  Ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the elderly: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Jacques Sedat; Mustapha Dib; David Rasendrarijao; Denys Fontaine; Michel Lonjon; Philippe Paquis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Karsten Papke; Friedhelm Brassel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Early Experience Studying Cerebral Aneurysms with Rotational and Threedimensional Angiography and Review of CT and MR Angiography Literature.

Authors:  C H Castaño-Duque; J Ruscalleda-Nadal; M de Juan-Delago; E Guardia-Mas; L San Roman-Manzanera; F Bartomeus-Jene; J Molet-Teixido; P Tresserras-Ribo; P Pares-Muñoz; P Clavel Laria
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  D Y Yoon; K J Lim; C S Choi; B M Cho; S M Oh; S K Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  S Sakamoto; Y Kiura; M Shibukawa; S Ohba; K Arita; K Kurisu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Hemodynamics model of fluid-solid interaction in internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Xu Bai-Nan; Wang Fu-Yu; Liu Lei; Zhang Xiao-Jun; Ju Hai-Yue
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Can sufficient preoperative information of intracranial aneurysms be obtained by using 320-row detector CT angiography alone?

Authors:  Eri Hayashida; Akira Sasao; Toshinori Hirai; Kiyotoshi Hamasaki; Toru Nishi; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Yasuhiko Iryo; Joji Urata; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Intensive care of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international survey.

Authors:  Robert D Stevens; Neeraj S Naval; Marek A Mirski; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J Andrews
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Subtraction CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with conventional CT angiography.

Authors:  Qi Li; Fajin Lv; Yongmei Li; Kewei Li; Tianyou Luo; Peng Xie
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.