Literature DB >> 10598602

Effect of the duration of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response in patients with low back pain.

M A Hamza1, E A Ghoname, P F White, W F Craig, H E Ahmed, N M Gajraj, A S Vakharia, C E Noe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves produces acute analgesic effects. This randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study was designed to evaluate the effect of differing durations of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in 75 consenting patients with low back pain.
METHODS: All patients received electrical stimulation for four different time intervals (0, 15, 30, and 45 min) in a random sequence over the course of an 11-week study period. All active percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatments were administered using alternating frequencies of 15 and 30 Hz three times per week for 2 consecutive weeks. The prestudy assessments included the health status survey short form questionnaire and 10-cm visual analog scale scores for pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep, with 0 being the best and 10 being the worst. The pain scoring was repeated 5-10 min after each 60-min study session and 24 h after the last treatment session with each of the four methods. The daily oral analgesic requirements were assessed during each of the four treatment blocks. At the end of each 2-week treatment block, the questionnaire was repeated.
RESULTS: Electrical stimulation using percutaneously placed needles produced short-term improvements in the visual analog scale pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep scores, and a reduction in the oral analgesic requirements. The 30-min and 45-min durations of electrical stimulation produced similar hypoalgesic effects (48+/-21% and 46+/-19%, respectively) and were significantly more effective than either 15 min (21+/-17%) or 0 min (10+/-11%). The 30- and 45-min treatments were also more effective in improving physical activity and sleep scores over the course of the 2-week treatment period. In contrast to the sham treatment (0 min), the health status survey short form revealed that electrical stimulation for 15 to 45 min three times per week for 2 weeks improved patient function.
CONCLUSION: The recommended duration of electrical stimulation with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy is 30 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598602     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  Amole Khadilkar; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Lucie Brosseau; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

2.  Two sets of acupoint combination of similar functions engage shared neural representation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Wei Qin; Ji-xin Liu; Li Fang; Ming-hao Dong; Fu-wen Zhang; Cui Jiang; Jin-bo Sun; Karen M von Deneen; Fan-rong Liang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Effects of percutaneous neuromodulation in neuromusculoskeletal pathologies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ibon Fidalgo-Martin; Juan José Ramos-Álvarez; Roberto Murias-Lozano; Elena Sonsoles Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Downregulation of the spinal NMDA receptor NR2B subunit during electro-acupuncture relief of chronic visceral hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Hongping Liu; Yuhua Zhang; Debo Qi; Weimin Li
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  A novel image-guided, automatic, high-intensity neurostimulation device for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Miguel Gorenberg; Elad Schiff; Kobi Schwartz; Elon Eizenberg
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-21

6.  The Effects of Elgucare on Degenerated Intervertebral Disc-Induced Low Back Pain and Disc Regeneration: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Lo; Yu Ting Chen; Chen Ching Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Imaging-guided hyperstimulation analgesia in low back pain.

Authors:  Miguel Gorenberg; Kobi Schwartz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.