Literature DB >> 10597855

Sport medicine and the ethics of boxing.

S Leclerc1, C D Herrera.   

Abstract

In the light of medical evidence of the health risks associated with boxing, a watchful agnostic position among sport physicians is no longer justifiable. The normal activity in a boxing match places the athletes at risk of head injury, some of which may be difficult to detect and impossible to repair. This suggests that sport physicians and others expert in the prevention and diagnosis of such injuries should take a public stand against boxing, as other medical associations have. Although there is a need for continuing research into the health risks, doctors can in the interim take steps to increase public awareness of these risks. Sport physicians in particular can make a strong public statement by also ending their professional involvement with boxing. This need not be interpreted as paternalism; doctors are qualified neither to make laws nor to restrict private behaviour. Sport physicians are, however, well equipped to advise those who do make laws and those who choose to engage in boxing. In the end, because this stance against boxing will probably reduce the number of brain injuries in certain athletes, autonomy will be preserved, rather than restricted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10597855      PMCID: PMC1756214          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.33.6.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  14 in total

1.  Prescription drug laws: justified hard paternalism.

Authors:  George W Rainbolt
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Blunt force violence in America--shades of gray or red. Ultimate/extreme fighting.

Authors:  G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Boxing: does the size of the prize affect the drain on the brain?

Authors:  D C Fiore
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Boxing should be banned in civilized countries--round 3.

Authors:  G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  On boxing and liberty.

Authors:  R H Patterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Boxing clever.

Authors:  P D Toon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Participation of physicians in capital punishment.

Authors:  R D Truog; T A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Intracranial injuries resulting from boxing.

Authors:  A J Ryan
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 10.  Brain injury in ice hockey.

Authors:  C R Honey
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.638

View more
  2 in total

1.  Problems in health management of professional boxers in Japan.

Authors:  G Ohhashi; S Tani; S Murakami; M Kamio; T Abe; J Ohtuki
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Extended antipaternalism.

Authors:  S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.