BACKGROUND: This study examines the relationship between the threshold for plasma vasopressin concentration [PVP] responses and diuresis (Gauer-Henry reflex), and tests the hypothesis that water intake would not influence diuresis. METHODS: Eight men (19-25 yr) underwent four treatments: euhydration in air (Eu-air), euhydration in water immersion (Eu-H2O), and with prior 3.6% hypohydration in air (Hypo-air), and hypohydration in immersion (Hypo-H2O). Ad libitum drinking was allowed during the 3-h experimental and 1-h recovery periods. RESULTS: Drinking was greatest during the first 10 min: 3.5 ml x kg(-1) with Hypo-air (450 ml x 3 h(-1)) and only 1.7 ml x kg(-1) (p < 0.05) with Hypo-H2O (235 ml x 3 h(-1)). At 1 h, concomitant [PVP] decreased from a control level of 6.6+/-1.5 to 4.0+/-1 .0 pg x ml(-1) (delta = 2.6 pg x ml(-1), p < 0.05) with Hypo-air, and from 5.9+/-0.6 to 2.3+/-0.2 pg x ml(-1) (delta = 3.6 pg x ml(-1), p < 0.05) with Hypo-H2O. Urine flow was unchanged from control level (<1.0 ml x min(-1)) with Hypo-air, Hypo-H2O, and Eu-air, but increased to 4-5 ml x min(-1) with Eu-H2O. Neither water intake volume nor urine flow was related to the magnitude of [PVP] depression. Regression of Uosm/Posm ratio on [PVP] and urine flow indicated that [PVP] above 2 pg x ml(-1) did not affect urine flow. Thus, ad libitum water intake in previously hypohydrated subjects did not affect urine flow or the decrease in [PVP]. The threshold [PVP] to initiate significant diuresis was about 2 pg x ml(-1), and significant diuresis can occur with no change in [PVP] maintained at about 1 pg x ml(-1) during immersion in euhydrated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it appears that the Gauer-Henry reflex is not the major mechanism for immersion-induced diuresis. Clearly, other diuretic factors are also involved.
BACKGROUND: This study examines the relationship between the threshold for plasma vasopressin concentration [PVP] responses and diuresis (Gauer-Henry reflex), and tests the hypothesis that water intake would not influence diuresis. METHODS: Eight men (19-25 yr) underwent four treatments: euhydration in air (Eu-air), euhydration in water immersion (Eu-H2O), and with prior 3.6% hypohydration in air (Hypo-air), and hypohydration in immersion (Hypo-H2O). Ad libitum drinking was allowed during the 3-h experimental and 1-h recovery periods. RESULTS: Drinking was greatest during the first 10 min: 3.5 ml x kg(-1) with Hypo-air (450 ml x 3 h(-1)) and only 1.7 ml x kg(-1) (p < 0.05) with Hypo-H2O (235 ml x 3 h(-1)). At 1 h, concomitant [PVP] decreased from a control level of 6.6+/-1.5 to 4.0+/-1 .0 pg x ml(-1) (delta = 2.6 pg x ml(-1), p < 0.05) with Hypo-air, and from 5.9+/-0.6 to 2.3+/-0.2 pg x ml(-1) (delta = 3.6 pg x ml(-1), p < 0.05) with Hypo-H2O. Urine flow was unchanged from control level (<1.0 ml x min(-1)) with Hypo-air, Hypo-H2O, and Eu-air, but increased to 4-5 ml x min(-1) with Eu-H2O. Neither water intake volume nor urine flow was related to the magnitude of [PVP] depression. Regression of Uosm/Posm ratio on [PVP] and urine flow indicated that [PVP] above 2 pg x ml(-1) did not affect urine flow. Thus, ad libitum water intake in previously hypohydrated subjects did not affect urine flow or the decrease in [PVP]. The threshold [PVP] to initiate significant diuresis was about 2 pg x ml(-1), and significant diuresis can occur with no change in [PVP] maintained at about 1 pg x ml(-1) during immersion in euhydrated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it appears that the Gauer-Henry reflex is not the major mechanism for immersion-induced diuresis. Clearly, other diuretic factors are also involved.
Entities:
Keywords:
NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Regulatory Physiology; NASA Program Biomedical Research and Countermeasures
Authors: Ingrid Loder; Andreas Rössler; Gert Wurzinger; Roman Duncko; Daniela Jezova; Helmut Hinghofer-Szalkay Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-01-14 Impact factor: 3.078