Literature DB >> 10596027

Hantavirus infection in Taiwan: the experience of a geographically unique area.

C Chin1, T S Chiueh, W C Yang, T H Yang, C M Shih, H T Lin, K C Lin, J C Lien, T F Tsai, S L Ruo, S T Nichol, T G Ksiazek, P E Rollin, C J Peters, T N Wu, C Y Shen.   

Abstract

Hantaviruses are rodent-borne viruses, and they, mainly the Hantaan (HTN) serotype, are the causative agents of a group of febrile nephropathies known as "hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). " Despite the fact that HFRS is frequently reported in China, with an annual incidence of 50,000-100,000 cases, one puzzling observation that no local case of HFRS has been confirmed in Taiwan has yet to be explained. We hypothesized that the hantavirus strain prevailing in Taiwan mainly belongs to the mild strain, the Seoul (SEO) strain, and the absence of severe disease was related to the absence of HTN. To test these hypotheses, this epidemiologic study was performed, including a seroprevalence survey and phylogenetic analysis on hantavirus isolated from the rodent population trapped in major seaports, rural, and mountainous areas of Taiwan. This study also included rodents and viruses from two isolated islands, Kinmen and Matzu, which are geographically adjacent to the east coast of mainland China. There were a total of 5,461 rodents of 16 species captured, and R. norvegicus was the most common species, with an antibody prevalence much higher in international seaports (20%) than in rural regions (approximately 5%) and intermediate in some domestic seaports. By reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 33.9% of the seropositive R. norvegicus were found to have amplifiable hantavirus sequences in their lung tissues, and subsequent phylogenetic analyses indicated that almost all hantavirus in Taiwan was most closely related to the prototype SEO strain, and no HTN strain was recovered from any rodent species indigenous to Taiwan. The seroprevalence of SEO infection in R. norvegicus on Kinmen and Matzu was also different from that in southern provinces of China but closely resembled that in seaports in Taiwan, and the SEO identified was genetically linked to Taiwanese SEO strains. These results substantiate our hypotheses, and suggest that the epidemiology of hantavirus infection in Taiwan are different from that in China, where the HTN and SEO strains and HFRS concurrently prevail. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10596027     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(200002)60:2<237::aid-jmv21>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  5 in total

Review 1.  Global Diversity and Distribution of Hantaviruses and Their Hosts.

Authors:  Matthew T Milholland; Iván Castro-Arellano; Gerardo Suzán; Gabriel E Garcia-Peña; Thomas E Lee; Rodney E Rohde; A Alonso Aguirre; James N Mills
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Hantavirus infection with marked sinus bradycardia, Taiwan.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Liu; Jyh-Hsiung Huang; Po-Ren Hsueh; Kwen-Tay Luh
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Geo-spatial hotspots of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and genetic characterization of Seoul variants in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Shu-Qing Zuo; Li-Qun Fang; Lin Zhan; Pan-He Zhang; Jia-Fu Jiang; Li-Ping Wang; Jia-Qi Ma; Bing-Cai Wang; Ri-Min Wang; Xiao-Ming Wu; Hong Yang; Zhi-Wei Cao; Wu-Chun Cao
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-01-11

4.  The Ecology and Phylogeny of Hosts Drive the Enzootic Infection Cycles of Hantaviruses.

Authors:  Matthew T Milholland; Iván Castro-Arellano; Gabriel E Garcia-Peña; James N Mills
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Genetic and hosts characterization of hantaviruses in port areas in Hainan Province, P. R. China.

Authors:  Qiu-Wei Wang; Li Tao; Su-Ying Lu; Chang-Qiang Zhu; Le-le Ai; Yizhe Luo; Rong-Bin Yu; Heng Lv; Yun Zhang; Chong-Cai Wang; Wei-Long Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.