Literature DB >> 10595825

ICP monitoring in the rat: comparison of monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and cisterna magna.

M Zwienenberg1, Q Z Gong, L L Lee, R F Berman, B G Lyeth.   

Abstract

Various methods of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during experimental procedures in the rat have been described. However, no systematic comparison of ICP monitoring in the ventricle, brain parenchyma, and cisterna magna has been reported. Since accurate and reliable ICP measurements are important in experimental models of traumatic brain injury, the present study was conducted to compare simultaneous ICP measurements from ventricular, cisterna magna, and intraparenchymal monitors during ICP changes. Subdural hematoma was produced by infusion of 0.3 ml of autologous blood into the subdural space over 6 min. The ventricular and the intraparenchymal fiberoptic catheter produced reliable and comparable pressure recordings, that did not statistically differ (p = 0.4), throughout the one hour monitoring time. In contrast, the cisterna magna catheter was less reliable and produced significantly lower readings throughout the monitoring time (p<0.001). The intraparenchymal device produced greater cortical damage than the ventricular catheter. In conclusion, ventricular ICP monitoring is the preferred method under these circumstances, since it is accurate and induces least brain damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10595825     DOI: 10.1089/neu.1999.16.1095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Propofol on Excitatory and Inhibitory Amino Acid Neurotransmitter Balance in Rats with Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema Induced by Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Lili Zhang; Jin Jin; Jianyu Yao; Ziyong Yue; Yuting Wei; Wanchao Yang; Songbin Fu; Wenzhi Li
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents.

Authors:  Gregory J Gage; Daryl R Kipke; William Shain
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in normal dogs using subdural and intraparenchymal miniature strain-gauge transducers.

Authors:  Beverly K Sturges; Peter J Dickinson; Linda D Tripp; Irina Udaltsova; Richard A LeCouteur
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Preclinical update on regulation of intracranial pressure in relation to idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Sajedeh Eftekhari; Connar Stanley James Westgate; Maria Schmidt Uldall; Rigmor Hoejland Jensen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  Evidence for Decreased Brain Parenchymal Volume After Large Intracerebral Hemorrhages: a Potential Mechanism Limiting Intracranial Pressure Rises.

Authors:  Michael R Williamson; Frederick Colbourne
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 6.  Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-05-06

7.  Ceftriaxone therapy attenuates brain trauma in rats by affecting glutamate transporters and neuroinflammation and not by its antibacterial effects.

Authors:  Sher-Wei Lim; Hui-Chen Su; Tee-Tau Eric Nyam; Chung-Ching Chio; Jinn-Rung Kuo; Che-Chuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.